Oh, so many posts to read ! ^^
you can enable mmu in your uae settings or even use uaeenfircer directly, typing "winuaeenforcer" command into your amiga shell under uae. [...] however im not sure what compiler and build config you use. is it some form of amidevcpp?
i use cygwin 32bits and gcc-tools (with epoch2 and autom4te2, if I remember well) to compile Netsurf for AmigaOS3, and I use AmiKit V8 to launch NetSurf. I looked for the amiga shell on AmiKit but I didn't find it (but maybe I search in the wrong place, I don't know).
im sorry for this lengthy post, and things you may be aware of, but you seem to be new here, so i may be mentioning platitudes.
Don't worry, you're right to do this ! ^^ I'll try to read the link you post on one of your posts.
i think he would prefer you to fix the browser itself, before trying to implement javascript engine. this is what ducktape is, for what i recall?
That's the aim of DukTape, yes. I managed to make NetSurf 3.5 work without DukTape, and what I would like it's to make it work with DukTape. Of course NetSurf 3.5 isn't perfect and has some bugs, but at least it works, and it could work "better" with DukTape. Or maybe I should wait the 3.6 release version, as I can understand it doesn't contain DukTape ? ^^
Hi all!
Thanks for the interesting discussions and all the effort! I wanted to mention that linking with fortify really helps catching memory problems, maybe that could be an option for the development version of netSurf?
Maybe DNADNL could try?
Cheers!
Oh, I don't think I'm good enough to do this ! :lol: I downloaded and looked the fortify files... and it doesn't seem to be reachable (with my level) to create the call to fortify (I could break everything ! :lol: )
Right. It would have been better to say Netsurf, instead "it".
Java is nice, but I have high doubt that it would make Netsurf unuseable with real Amigas. Maybe latter with Vampire accelerators?
OK, I understand well, now.