BTW, this clearly demonstrates that you don't know what you are talking about. VHDL is not a "language like any other programming language". It is a _hardware description_ language, not a _programming language_.
I don't get how you can argue that a Language used for Programming is not a programming language.
Field Programmable Logic Array. VHSIC Hardware Description Language
VHDL borrows heavily from the Ada programming language in both concepts and syntax.
It's like saying that you could write a true equivalence of Shakespeares body of work in Inuit because it is just another language like English is.
No, that would be a straw man. A common occurrence in your attempts to derail any discussion.
This particular one seems to be aimed at
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turing_completeness One to start with is that there is no concept of parallelism in any of the programming languages I'm familiar with
That is your ignorance showing. Not all programming languages are procedural.
With OpenCL you can:
Leverage CPUs and GPUs to accelerate parallel computation
Get dramatic speedups for computationally intensive applications
https://developer.amd.com/wordpress/media/2012/10/OpenCL_Parallel_Computing_for_CPUs_and_GPUs_201003.pdfOver time it's likely we'll see more software switch to GPGPU
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General-purpose_computing_on_graphics_processing_units To the point that WinUAE will have some of the same advantages as an FPGA emulation of a 68k amiga (eg generate the video on the graphics card to remove a layer of latency in the OS).
That is also why you need a high MHz CPU interpreting foreign CPU code of a 6502 or 68k while you only need an FPGA running at 80 MHz to exceed 68060 speed as demonstrated by the Apollo Core.
Sure. I understand that, but it doesn't solve any issue of whether that is emulation or not. We know that dedicating logic gates to a particular task has a greater efficiency than time sharing them. It's an implementation detail.