The race is on!

[KennyR]

Quixote wrote:
You do realize that any force sufficient to compell "all militarists" would qulify as militarists themselves? Logistically difficult, that.

Use of force does not imply militarism. Militarism, however, always implies use of force.

Also qualifying as militarist is the mind that toys with rounding up whole segments of humanity. Would you be the first in line to jump in the lake?

It's a loch. And no. I'd have to practice my goose step and buy a flag to qualify.

[FluffyMcDeath]

Fade wrote:
Non sequitur? I think not.

Indeed it seems that you think not a great deal at all.
I have given you too much credit. You obviously have no idea what "non sequitur" means.

[Fade]

Don't know what it means in Canada, but in the rest of the world it means "does not follow".

[sir_inferno]

ahh, knowing the russians it'll probably rust in a day due to lack of funding...

[FluffyMcDeath]

Fade wrote:
Don't know what it means in Canada, but in the rest of the world it means "does not follow".

Excellent. And now that you've looked it up, do you want to go back and try and make an argument that does follow?

[sir_inferno]

lol :-)

[that_punk_guy]

Zing! :-D

(Sorry, I just like saying "Zing.")

I'm done now.

The American government is so paranoid that it'llmake a defence system for any supposed 'threat'. All that needs to happen now is for N.Korea to say they have a laser reflector on a sattelite, which always points at the U.S. , and they can zap any American location at anytime.

Bush will believe it, and spend lots of money building some kind of reflector shield over America XD

[KennyR]

I did it, I linked zing to this thread. See here.

[that_punk_guy]

Heh heh :-D

[Argo]

So, we shouldn't mention the Easter Bunny then. eh?