Is Iapetus artificial?

[Speelgoedmannetje]

what a load of bullcrap that site is

VERY vague suggestions of the planet being 'made of hexadiagonals' (that crater hexadiagonal? Hardly. Okay, tis not completely round like other craters but that can be caused by the previous craters, the substance/shape of the meteorite, and the substance of the moon, like Blob said).
Just picking one suggestive photo of a sunset of the moon? Come on! Put that plastic glue bag away!
Okay the moon has a extraordinary line on it's surface, and I'm eager to know the cause of that. But not by that 'factual' site.
It's just laughable.

[Speelgoedmannetje]

falemagn wrote:

Probably, but so far you've not even tried to counterargument Hoagland's hypothesis, labelling it as impossible right away, and proposing even more unlikely scenarios. It's this attitude I'm questioning.

And you're not questioning Hoaglands attitude and way of presenting his 'proof'? :-?

oh dear :lol: you want to believe him, right?

[Speelgoedmannetje]

falemagn wrote:

And you're not questioning Hoaglands attitude and way of presenting his 'proof'?

oh dear you want to believe him, right?

Have you missed the message where I proposed an alternative scenario?

You did NOT propose an alternative scenario.

[Speelgoedmannetje]

falemagn wrote:
what are you afraid of? :-)

of crying maria statues

Seriously, give a read to what I write before replying.

I did.
Seriously.
Found only vague hints of you calling yourself 'open minded' towards other explanations, but until then you call this hoagland theory a fact.

[Speelgoedmannetje]

falemagn wrote:

I did.
Seriously.
Found only vague hints of you calling yourself 'open minded' towards other explanations, but until then you call this hoagland theory a fact.

Then you don't know how to read. Moreover, you're implicitely saying I'm so stupid as of claiming I did something it would be so easy to verify I haven't.

I give you one last chance before plastering the link to the message I'm referring to all around your face :-)

Leave it. I'm tired of your attitude.

[Speelgoedmannetje]

Karlos wrote:
To be clear about it, I'm not opposed to the idea that the item may be artificial.

Me neither...
BUT.. this very wild hypothesis brought agressively with very vague suggestions... I've seen that hocuspocus before :roll:
Thing that irritates me the most is the labelling of ppl criticizing this wild (and unproven) stuff as being close minded, or even comparing them to the ancient catholic church wich condemned the observations of Copernicus or Galilei :pissed:

[Speelgoedmannetje]

:lol: