@ Downix
Last time I checked, however, I didn't ask "what was more popular."
I fail to see your point. *I* was talking about which solution is more popular, even
amongst mainly German Aachen show visitors (Peg/MOS are German products, Genesi focussed event). So there is a much larger group amongst our little community, who want to have AmigaOS4 specificly.
A group of Germans would prefer a Pegasos/AmigaOS4 combination, which of course will not happen before Genesi signs a contract. And it should be noted that this was also influenced by Genesi's FUD spread about Mai and Eyetech's products, which may backfire as AmigaOne-XE boards use the new Articia chipsets, unlike still unavailable Pegasos boards.
But considering Genesi's crusade, I doubt that this would become possible any time soon.
Do not forget that you asked: "What more do you want?". Answer "AmigaOS4".
so it looks like AOS4 and MOS are equal in that respect.
The point is that many people want AmigaOS4 specificly, the legacy Amiga software compatibility isn't a decisive argument to many. It would be fairly easy to create a UAE solution, including chipset emulations on top of a Linux, QNX or whatever other kernel, which then takes over the complete system in a similar way like the ABOX currently does.
Or ExecSG, which is also an alien kernel that can emulate the Executive Library.
Correction, ExecSG is a new and improved PPC version of the original Exec kernel. There is no additional kernel running on top of ExecSG.