Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: A2080 i.e. Vampire 500 V2 on an Amiga 2000  (Read 12307 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mindprober

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Mar 2004
  • Posts: 480
  • Country: us
  • Gender: Male
    • Show all replies
Re: A2080 i.e. Vampire 500 V2 on an Amiga 2000
« on: August 10, 2016, 04:43:46 PM »
It occurred to me that if you can provide 68k and "AGA" in an FPGA, wouldn't PowerPC also be possible?
 

Offline mindprober

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Mar 2004
  • Posts: 480
  • Country: us
  • Gender: Male
    • Show all replies
Re: A2080 i.e. Vampire 500 V2 on an Amiga 2000
« Reply #1 on: August 10, 2016, 04:55:08 PM »
I figured if a 100MHz 68k was possible, PowerPC wouldn't be too far-fetched.  :D

Quote from: OlafS3;812364
IBM even owns a FPGA implementation of PPC (of course asking for money). Gunnar says it makes no sense because it is too slow.
 

Offline mindprober

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Mar 2004
  • Posts: 480
  • Country: us
  • Gender: Male
    • Show all replies
Re: A2080 i.e. Vampire 500 V2 on an Amiga 2000
« Reply #2 on: August 10, 2016, 09:58:58 PM »
Oh well. Maybe this might be made some day:

http://ultimateppc.nl/specifications.php

It's for big box Amigas, though. I think Gideon is way too busy with the 1541 Ultimate right now though.  :D

Quote from: Thomas Richter;812378
Not really. You should keep in mind that the PPC has longer opcodes, and performs less operations per opcode as it is a risk processor. Thus, you first need twice the bandwidth of the 68K to get the same number of instructions into the processor, then you also need *more* instructions to get the same operation(s) done.  Thus, even if you get a FPGA implmentation of a PPC running at 250Mhz, you still don't have quite the power of a 250Mhz equivalent of a 68K. It's more like a 100Mhz 68K, if not even less.