Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: X1000 benchmarks  (Read 10570 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline bbond007

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 1517
    • Show all replies
Re: X1000 benchmarks
« on: February 03, 2012, 10:54:58 PM »
I can't decide...

Should I buy 10 mac mini G4 computers with MorphOS licences (assuming I can get a mini with 512K and Morphos license for $300) or should I purchase one X1000?

What would be faster?
 

Offline bbond007

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 1517
    • Show all replies
Re: X1000 benchmarks
« Reply #1 on: February 04, 2012, 12:25:50 AM »
I think it would be interesting to run some sort of 68K based benchmark.

I could provide results for

UAE on a i7 740QM which is a 1.7 (i think)
MorphOS 2.6 on 1.42 mini
A1200/060/FastATA IV

if so, what benchmark application?
 

Offline bbond007

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 1517
    • Show all replies
Re: X1000 benchmarks
« Reply #2 on: February 04, 2012, 01:18:00 AM »
Quote from: wawrzon;679084
apart from multicore support i dont see how 64bit operation would speed up anything. in fact my 64bit version of lightwave9 was marhinally slower than a 32bit on my then 64bit capable system. 64bit operation enabled amounts of memory are anyway marginally useful under amiga-like applications. so thats imho not a point.

I think it depends a great deal on the CPU architecture.

For example, the original netburst P4 and the Itanic took a huge performance hit running legacy code.
« Last Edit: February 04, 2012, 01:30:15 AM by bbond007 »