Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: lame benchmarks (pun intended)  (Read 12762 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jorkany

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2006
  • Posts: 1009
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.amigaos4.com
Re: lame benchmarks (pun intended)
« on: February 02, 2012, 06:05:15 PM »
An invalid comparison. The PPC Macs are outdated hardware from 2006, the X1000 is brand new hardware! As such the X1000 should be compared to current hardware.

From the A-eon website:
Quote
The X1000 ends the years of AmigaOS being relegated to a ghetto of outdated hardware - great as it was at the time, the world has moved on a long way since the days of Commodore. For the first time in many years, AmigaOS has a genuinely modern hardware platform.
 

Offline jorkany

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2006
  • Posts: 1009
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.amigaos4.com
Re: lame benchmarks (pun intended)
« Reply #1 on: February 02, 2012, 07:08:54 PM »
Quote from: pampers;678795
Piru - any chance to benchmark it under experimental MorphOS on G5 Mac?

Piru, also could you link the source audio file you used in the conversion?
 

Offline jorkany

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2006
  • Posts: 1009
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.amigaos4.com
Re: lame benchmarks (pun intended)
« Reply #2 on: February 03, 2012, 01:00:14 AM »
Quote from: haywirepc;678881
Where can I find a windows binary of this lame encoder? Looked but only found source tarballs. I'd like to run this test on a windows and linux machine and see the results and how they stack up against x1000 on quad core and 6 core intel machines.

Steven


Right here brah:
http://lame.sourceforge.net/links.php#Windows

No command line. There's a couple there that appear to be lame with a GUI frontend, but all the rest incorporate lame as programmatic interface and seem to use lame as just one step in their processing.