Neko wrote:
Apparently Bill McEwen did turn up at court that weekend, which more than adequately explains why he was not at Amiwest.
He knew about the court date a long time before he announced his attendance, but if I recall correctly before he lost the Bolton Peck case.
Moving onto the jeopardy, who knows what that meant: but he has been ordered to pay some thousands of dollars in one court case (as above), so one can only assume he went to court in order to make sure he had a chance of putting his side across, and not putting himself in more *financial* jeopardy.
Being ordered by a court that you owe more money than most Americans earn in a year would be, in my mind, jeopardy enough to try not to have it happen again, wouldn't you say?
I would please ask people to leave the guy alone now. I'm sure he has been through enough, and if it happened to you, you would not want it being dragged around the world as rumours and conjecture.
This isn't Enron, this isn't Iraq, this is one guy's life you're muddying, for no reason other than your own amusement, and I think that's sickening enough.
Well, frankly, I don't care about Mr McEwan. I do care that a company he owns(?)/runs(?) has locked out a Tradmark that should be owned by a more worth while company.
BTW, Who/what is "Genesi UK"?