Hold on there for a second. Are you telling me that OS 4.1 between SAM440 and X1000 in terms of development is a huge difference like say between developing for kickstart 3.1,AGA 68030 verses say on an Amiga 500 kickstart 1.3, OCS?
That software developers could easily target for X1000 while both SAM440 and X1000 run OS 4.1 that the program will fail to run on SAM440 and will only run on X1000 that...in the end the developers need to develop for two separate platforms as if you are developing the same game for xBox 360 and PS 3? Because if what you are saying is true....then not only is that awesome....but as a developer I could easily enjoy this :laugh1::laugh1::laugh1::laugh1::laugh1:!!!
I think the biggest issue will be pure CPU power.
The PA6T running on one core already holds an advantage.
If Hyperion gets SMP or ASMP working the X1000 will have two core to the Samantha's one.
Then again,m the next top of the line A-eon board is supposed to be a four core based system.
To all you naysayers, you may think I myself and other MorphOS fanatics are somewhat elitist. But we've been following this closely since it was first announced.
I had an inkling who was behind it before it was announced.
AND its successor will use components that stimulate me in a most unnatural way (considering we are just talking computer hardware).
Hey, why are so many of you down about this?
Yeah, its been expensive (but as was pointed out, no worse than the A4000 used to be).
And WE WON!
We have three NG OS.
New hardware and alternative platforms for the economy minded.
And Bill McEwen isn't making a cent off of us.
Pretty damned cool and a tribute the the power of our collective devotion.