Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: For The Worst Of Us, The Diagnosis May Be 'Evil' (*Sensitive Reader Caution)  (Read 3138 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline T_Bone

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2002
  • Posts: 5124
    • Show only replies by T_Bone
    • http://www.amiga.org/userinfo.php?uid=1961
Re: For The Worst Of Us, The Diagnosis May Be 'Evil' (*Sensitive Reader Caution)
« Reply #14 from previous page: February 09, 2005, 07:55:17 PM »
Quote

KennyR wrote:
The nature of these people's crimes makes it hard ever to accept that they are comitting them because they are "sick", but they are. A normal person cannot do these things. There are too many psychological safeguards.


I wonder how many of those safeguards are above sea level though, er, consious. They can be ignored at will, by perfectly normal people.

I wonder if this line is even the same or everyone. Are processes that happen mostly consiously in one, occuring unconsiously in most others?

Anyone can act normal, but can anyone be abnormal at will?
this space for rent
 

Offline KennyR

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 8081
    • Show only replies by KennyR
    • http://wrongpla.net
Quote
T_Bone wrote:
I wonder how many of those safeguards are above sea level though, er, consious. They can be ignored at will, by perfectly normal people.

I wonder if this line is even the same or everyone. Are processes that happen mostly consiously in one, occuring unconsiously in most others?

Anyone can act normal, but can anyone be abnormal at will?


You can no more do this than conciously stick your hand in a fire and let it burn. At some point something subconcious kicks in. In the case of your hand, it's an evolved response to prevent you from harm. In the case of impulse action, it's not much different, except the mechanism is more complex. Most people wouldn't even be able to poke another person in the eye, even if they wanted to.

Everyone has dark thoughts - we are killers, after all, with complex and powerful sexual drives. On top of this is an evolved psychological control system, which can be degraded or strengthened by life experiences. Sometimes, for whatever reason, people lose control. They remain conscious, calculating, and intelligent; but they don't have these barriers any more. They know what wrong is, they know what pity is - but they can still do what they do.

There's an old story about how to tell a psychopath apart from a normal person. A woman is at her mother's funeral, and spots an attractive man, who she then loses. If she was a psychopath, she'd kill her father on the off chance that he'd come back. And psychopathia is just one of the less subtle of mental illnesses.
 

Offline Speelgoedmannetje

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2002
  • Posts: 9656
    • Show only replies by Speelgoedmannetje
Quote

Wain wrote:
Nothing can be clearly defined as Evil because the entire concept is subject to interpretation.

yes, and considering the human brain, interpretation is everything,
and that's what these scientists are trying to get at
These mad ppl try to do as bad as possible considering their interpretation
And the canary said: \'chirp\'
 

Offline Karlos

  • Sockologist
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 16867
  • Country: gb
  • Thanked: 4 times
    • Show only replies by Karlos
Quote
Most people wouldn't even be able to poke another person in the eye, even if they wanted to.


Oooh, I dunno. I could quite happily give Tony Bliar of Dubya a good comedy finger jab in the eye.
int p; // A
 

Offline the_leanderTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 3448
    • Show only replies by the_leander
    • http://www.extropia.co.uk/theleander/
Wow, what a broad range of responses, heh, not bad for my first post into this CH (IIRC).
Blessed Be,
Alan Fisher - the_leander

[SIGPIC]http://www.extropia.co.uk/theleander/[/SIGPIC]
 

Offline Wilse

@Karlos:

I'd pay to watch that. :-)

Offline Karlos

  • Sockologist
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 16867
  • Country: gb
  • Thanked: 4 times
    • Show only replies by Karlos
Quote

Wilse wrote:
@Karlos:

I'd pay to watch that. :-)


I'd do the other eye as an encore for free :lol:
int p; // A