Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Emulators better than the real thing?  (Read 5293 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline murple

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 579
    • Show only replies by murple
    • http://www.murple.net
Re: Emulators better than the real thing?
« Reply #44 from previous page: August 15, 2007, 06:53:51 PM »
Quote

vic20owner wrote:
Well, after a couple weeks of tweaking, hacking, and rebooting my A1200 trying to get various demos and games installed via WHDload, my success rate is about 50%.


No offense, I had some similar issues before too... but I suspect that a large part of your problems are due to PEBKAC errors.
 

Offline vic20ownerTopic starter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2004
  • Posts: 400
    • Show only replies by vic20owner
Re: Emulators better than the real thing?
« Reply #45 on: August 15, 2007, 09:21:23 PM »

Um, well, I doubt it. I used DMS to write the State of the art demo to a floppy, and cold booted from it.  It locked up after 3 seconds.

Where in there does PEBKAC come into play?

Btw, I've been using Amigas since 1989, and have had about 13 of them of the past 10 years (3 3000's, 4 1200's, 6 500's).

I am using 3.0 roms skicked to 3.1.  It doesn't seem to work with either.  I just ordered some 3.1 roms just in case... plus it'll allow me to remove some patches.





Amiga 1200 030/50mhz 64MB Fast Ram 20GB HD
DTCV, S-Video hack, 1084S-D1, PCMCIA Wireless
 

Offline Doobrey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2002
  • Posts: 1876
    • Show only replies by Doobrey
    • http://www.doobreynet.co.uk
Re: Emulators better than the real thing?
« Reply #46 on: August 15, 2007, 09:26:14 PM »
@vic20owner
 wikipedia's definition sums it up politely

Edit.. never mind, you were editing your post while I was replying
On schedule, and suing