Amiga.org

Operating System Specific Discussions => MorphOS => MorphOS -- Hardware requirements and availability discussion => Topic started by: mt12345 on March 27, 2011, 11:33:34 PM

Title: Performance?
Post by: mt12345 on March 27, 2011, 11:33:34 PM
Hi everyone!
I'm going to buy an old powermac g4 (400 mhz, 512 ram,radeon 9xxx) and give MorphOS a try.
What performance should I expect? Will I be able to watch divx movies at  fullscreen? And play 3D games ? Would you compare it to running gnome/linux on, let's say, 1ghz pentium3 box?
Title: Re: Performance?
Post by: Matt_H on March 27, 2011, 11:44:06 PM
400MHz might be a little slow for video playback, but I'll let someone who owns a machine at that speed comment on their own.

All PowerMacs are very, very cheap, though, so I think you'll get the most bang for your buck by picking up one of the later models (1.25GHz or 1.42GHz).
Title: Re: Performance?
Post by: Fab on March 28, 2011, 12:43:36 AM
Quote from: mt12345;625156
Hi everyone!
I'm going to buy an old powermac g4 (400 mhz, 512 ram,radeon 9xxx) and give MorphOS a try.
What performance should I expect? Will I be able to watch divx movies at  fullscreen? And play 3D games ? Would you compare it to running gnome/linux on, let's say, 1ghz pentium3 box?


Fullscreen or not won't be the issue here, since the video player (mplayer) uses overlay and scaling/stretching is entirely done by gfx card hardware in this case.

As for the codecs & resolution, you can easily play 640x360 h264 on such a machine, and 640x480 divx/xvid as well.
On the other hand DVD playback will be a bit too much (except if done from hard disk), and obviously any more demanding stuff like 720p h264 files and co will be too slow.

As for 3d games, i guess quake3 shouldn't behave too bad. To be checked.

And compared to a gnome/1GHz PIII, well, the PC has a clear advantage about raw cpu power, but the linux UI (gnome in this case) is way less responsive, so i'd say MorphOS would win on the responsivity anyway, but you'll have to try and see for yourself. :)
Title: Re: Performance?
Post by: amigadave on March 28, 2011, 12:44:37 AM
Quote from: Matt_H;625157
400MHz might be a little slow for video playback, but I'll let someone who owns a machine at that speed comment on their own.

All PowerMacs are very, very cheap, though, so I think you'll get the most bang for your buck by picking up one of the later models (1.25GHz or 1.42GHz).

I agree with Matt, don't buy that 400MHz G4 PowerMac, until you shop around, as you can probably find a faster G4 model for the same or less money.  I got a Dual 1.25GHz G4 model (the MDD model) for less than $40 and was able to pick it up locally, so I didn't have to pay any shipping either.

The 400MHz model will run MorphOS2.7 okay, but don't expect to playback any video content smoothly.

Shop around.
Title: Re: Performance?
Post by: mt12345 on March 28, 2011, 12:54:09 AM
Quote from: Fab;625161
And compared to a gnome/1GHz PIII, well, the PC has a clear advantage about raw cpu power, but the linux UI (gnome in this case) is way less responsive, so i'd say MorphOS would win on the responsivity anyway, but you'll have to try and see for yourself. :)


I should rather compare it to fluxbox/linux on 600-700Mhz PC I guess.
Title: Re: Performance?
Post by: Iggy on March 28, 2011, 12:56:55 AM
Quote from: amigadave;625162
I agree with Matt, don't buy that 400MHz G4 PowerMac, until you shop around, as you can probably find a faster G4 model for the same or less money.  I got a Dual 1.25GHz G4 model (the MDD model) for less than $40 and was able to pick it up locally, so I didn't have to pay any shipping either.

The 400MHz model will run MorphOS2.7 okay, but don't expect to playback any video content smoothly.

Shop around.

Yep, I'd agree with both Matt and David. Recently I saw a 733 Powermac sell for $20. That would be about the minimum I'd recommend.
I purchased a 733Mhz Quicksilver model that wasn't supposed to be functional on Ebay for about that much plus S&H. I reseated the processor card and its been working fine since (upgraded later to a 933Mhz processor and now to a 1.8Ghz processor).

You can do better.
Title: Re: Performance?
Post by: mt12345 on March 28, 2011, 01:07:23 AM
Quote from: amigadave;625162
I agree with Matt, don't buy that 400MHz G4 PowerMac, until you shop around, as you can probably find a faster G4 model for the same or less money.


Few years ago I bought Pentium II 300Mhz 256 RAM  for £1 just to show my friends that we don't really  need 3GHz Pentium4 to do internet, office and even divx playback. I love old, slow and limited computers. There is always something to squeeze out of it. Besides it's challenge. New hardware is boring. :lol:
Title: Re: Performance?
Post by: nicholas on March 28, 2011, 01:12:19 AM
Quote from: mt12345;625165
I should rather compare it to fluxbox/linux on 600-700Mhz PC I guess.


Rather, compare it to AROS running on that 600 MHz PC and you will get a very good idea of how fast MorphOS will be on a 400 MHz G4.
Title: Re: Performance?
Post by: mt12345 on March 28, 2011, 01:15:07 AM
Quote from: Iggy;625168
Recently I saw a 733 Powermac sell for $20.


Here, in the UK, for $20 you could get merely powermac G3 CASE. And  you're lucky if you find PSU inside.
Title: Re: Performance?
Post by: nicholas on March 28, 2011, 01:19:05 AM
Quote from: mt12345;625173
Here, in the UK, for $20 you could get merely powermac G3 CASE. And  you're lucky if you find PSU inside.


I bought a 1.25 GHz G4 eMac with 1GB RAM for £27 on ebay the day MOS was released for that model.
Title: Re: Performance?
Post by: mt12345 on March 28, 2011, 01:26:08 AM
eMac is bulky and  ugly. Not sexy at all.  ;)
Title: Re: Performance?
Post by: smerf on March 28, 2011, 02:01:00 AM
Quote from: mt12345;625156
Hi everyone!
I'm going to buy an old powermac g4 (400 mhz, 512 ram,radeon 9xxx) and give MorphOS a try.
What performance should I expect? Will I be able to watch divx movies at  fullscreen? And play 3D games ? Would you compare it to running gnome/linux on, let's say, 1ghz pentium3 box?


Hi,

Seeing that it is a MAC, darn I hate MACS, don't listen to me.

but

I doubt it would play movies, a 400mhz cpu could barely get out of its way.

It might play some 3d games like doom, heretic, etc.

Didn't know anyone still used 1ghz pentium3 boxes???

smerf
Title: Re: Performance?
Post by: Fab on March 28, 2011, 02:18:40 AM
Quote
I doubt it would play movies, a 400mhz cpu could barely get out of its way.
smerf

Depends what kind of movie you play. Even an efika could deal with 360p divx/xvid movies, on MorphOS (forget that on linux :)). And as i said earlier, A 400MHz G4 can deal with 360p H264 (which is typical youtube resolution), and 640*4x0 divx/xvid (typical tv rip stuff).

I could only suggest a 1.25/1.42GHz machine, but don't underestimate what a 400MHz machine can do anyway.
Title: Re: Performance?
Post by: kickstart on March 28, 2011, 02:23:07 AM
If you dont use application that need a heavy usage of cpu maybe 400mhz are enough, the bad side of the powermac g4 400mhz is the ati rage.
Title: Re: Performance?
Post by: Iggy on March 28, 2011, 02:29:11 AM
Quote from: kickstart;625201
If you dont use application that need a heavy usage of cpu maybe 400mhz are enough, the bad side of the powermac g4 400mhz is the ati rage.

I think he mentioned that it had a Radeon 9XXX video card. An ATI Rage128 would be pretty painful (no 3D), but I understand the 2D driver works pretty good.
When compared to an Efika, a 400Mhz Powermac with 512MB of memory would definitely be superior.
And there's always the possibility of adding a CPU accelerator card.
Title: Re: Performance?
Post by: mt12345 on March 28, 2011, 08:29:52 AM
Yes, I was wondering how efica runs morphos having only 128mb and 400mhz
Title: Re: Performance?
Post by: mt12345 on March 28, 2011, 08:34:43 AM
Quote from: smerf;625192
Didn't know anyone still used 1ghz pentium3 boxes???

smerf


Well I'm using pentium3 laptop as (headless) router + downloader + file server
Title: Re: Performance?
Post by: mt12345 on March 30, 2011, 12:13:38 AM
Quote from: Iggy;625204
I think he mentioned that it had a Radeon 9XXX video card. An ATI Rage128 would be pretty painful (no 3D), but I understand the 2D driver works pretty good.
When compared to an Efika, a 400Mhz Powermac with 512MB of memory would definitely be superior.
And there's always the possibility of adding a CPU accelerator card.


I'm going to buy Digital Audio model - 533 MHz on faster bus than older 400 Mhz models.
It has Geforce video card. I understand It won't work at all?
I want to change it to Radeon 7000 as it's cheap and easier to find than 9xxx models.
On MOS website Radeon 7000VE is listed as compatible. What is 'VE'? Will standard 7000 (non-VE) work?
(I mean Mac edition, I don't want to flash PC cards).
I'm not actually big fan of 3D games and I used to have R7000 on i386 linux laptop and I was pleased with its performance.
http://www.morphos-team.net/hardware.html
Title: Re: Performance?
Post by: mt12345 on March 30, 2011, 12:36:39 AM
Forget it.  I'll go for 8500/9000 :)
Title: Re: Performance?
Post by: Fab on March 30, 2011, 01:28:21 AM
Quote from: mt12345;625868
Forget it.  I'll go for 8500/9000 :)


Good pick. :)
Title: Re: Performance?
Post by: mt12345 on March 30, 2011, 01:42:10 AM
Quote
Quote:  
Didn't know anyone still used 1ghz pentium3 boxes???


Well I'm using pentium3 laptop as (headless) router + downloader + file server


Currently I'm trying to  resurrect Pentium II 400MHz SONY VAIO 10inch notebook :biglaugh::biglaugh::biglaugh:
Title: Re: Performance?
Post by: Iggy on March 30, 2011, 01:58:39 AM
Quote from: mt12345;625868
Forget it.  I'll go for 8500/9000 :)

Yep, much better performance than the 7000. Right now probably the two best options.
Title: Re: Performance?
Post by: desantii on March 30, 2011, 04:17:36 AM
Well after reading this I am now tempted to try MorphOs. I just won an ebay 1.42 dual G4 so will be tying it soon!
Title: Re: Performance?
Post by: Iggy on March 30, 2011, 04:52:33 AM
Quote from: desantii;625920
Well after reading this I am now tempted to try MorphOs. I just won an ebay 1.42 dual G4 so will be tying it soon!


Nice system, I hope you got a good price.
Since trying MorphOS is free, you've got nothing to lose.
What video card is installed in the MDD you bought?
Title: Re: Performance?
Post by: desantii on March 30, 2011, 05:02:53 AM
I got it for $95

Has a Radeon 9000 pro

Looking forward to it

Quote from: Iggy;625925
Nice system, I hope you got a good price.
Since trying MorphOS is free, you've got nothing to lose.
What video card is installed in the MDD you bought?
Title: Re: Performance?
Post by: Iggy on March 30, 2011, 05:20:47 AM
Quote from: desantii;625927
I got it for $95

Has a Radeon 9000 pro

Looking forward to it

Yep, great price, good video card for MorphOS, you did well.
Title: Re: Performance?
Post by: krashan on March 30, 2011, 05:34:17 AM
I have a 500 MHz "GigaBit Ethernet" PowerMac with R9000. It is magnitude faster than Efika + I have 1152 MB RAM in it instead of 128, which does make a difference :-). Youtube movies play smoothly in overlay mode. I've not tried some higher resolution movies however.
Title: Re: Performance?
Post by: mt12345 on March 30, 2011, 09:30:14 AM
Quote from: desantii;625920
I just won an ebay 1.42 dual G4 so will be tying it soon!


Does MorphOS make use of dual processor?
Title: Re: Performance?
Post by: Amiga_Nut on March 30, 2011, 10:51:13 AM
Off topic a bit, but I used to play full screen standard 700mb DVDrips on a 266mhz P2 mobile processor with just 192mb RAM. It did have the Mobility Rage Pro ATI mobile chipset however but this is far inferior to any desktop machine's GPU card in 100s of Mhz CPU speed.

That was with Windows 98.
Title: Re: Performance?
Post by: jj on March 30, 2011, 12:27:01 PM
Quote from: mt12345;625951
Does MorphOS make use of dual processor?

nope
Title: Re: Performance?
Post by: paolone on March 30, 2011, 04:29:50 PM
Quote from: Amiga_Nut;625960
Off topic a bit, but I used to play full screen standard 700mb DVDrips on a 266mhz P2 mobile processor with just 192mb RAM. It did have the Mobility Rage Pro ATI mobile chipset however but this is far inferior to any desktop machine's GPU card in 100s of Mhz CPU speed.

That was with Windows 98.

I went from my former 400 MHz K6 processor to a nice faster 1GHz Athlon when I saw how it played DVD rips, and you're arguing that a 266 MHz mobile P2 would have been enough? Please don't go on kidding: in order to play movies encoded at decent bitrates without loosing frames, you need power.

On the other hand, my old G3/400 iBook performed enough well with DivX videos, but it skipped frames too. I should remove a little dust from it and try it again...
Title: Re: Performance?
Post by: vidarh on March 30, 2011, 04:34:44 PM
Quote from: paolone;626015
I went from my former 400 MHz K6 processor to a nice faster 1GHz Athlon when I saw how it played DVD rips, and you're arguing that a 266 MHz mobile P2 would have been enough?


He said he had a Mobility Rage Pro GPU - it has hardware video decoding support. Makes all the difference.
Title: Re: Performance?
Post by: Iggy on March 30, 2011, 05:43:44 PM
Quote from: vidarh;626017
He said he had a Mobility Rage Pro GPU - it has hardware video decoding support. Makes all the difference.

Well, I've owned a few Rage 128 pro cards (including a couple of the relatively rare higher clocked ones) and I've got to agree that a 266MHz PII would be pushing it.
It wouldn't take much to see dropped frames on that type of system.
Title: Re: Performance?
Post by: mt12345 on March 31, 2011, 10:18:48 PM
Quote from: Iggy;625893


[Originally Posted by mt12345]
   [Forget it. I'll go for 8500/9000]

Yep, much better performance than the 7000. Right now probably the two best options


9000 or 9200?
I heard that 9000 works better but 9200 has 128MB...
Title: Re: Performance?
Post by: Iggy on March 31, 2011, 11:02:31 PM
Quote from: mt12345;626369
9000 or 9200?
I heard that 9000 works better but 9200 has 128MB...

Identical except the 9200 is an AGP8X part (and therefore is found in PCs and requires flashing and taping pins 3 and 11).
The 9000 is available as a 128MB card too.
The 8500 is faster and with its slower derivative the 8500LE/9100 also has more texture units and vertex shaders.
However, the Apple 8500 only has 64MB so any PC card flashed with an Apple BIOS will also be limited to 64MB (regardless of the built in memory).

Avoid the 9200SE or the 9250 which has a 64bit memory bus and is slower.
Title: Re: Performance?
Post by: mt12345 on April 01, 2011, 01:22:59 AM
Quote from: Iggy;625204

When compared to an Efika, a 400Mhz Powermac with 512MB of memory would definitely be superior.


What is Efika's CPU, actually? I read somewhere that it's comparable to (or based on)  603e.