BT/OPENREACH has put out a statement, I have not seen it, but It is false.
I have got someone else to look into this claim, because what they are saying is just to protect themselves, and is a lie.
They are saying the data files are old. In my eyes that's good, as it shows just how long he's been tapping into customers lines.
Remember I am in one of the videos and I even walk pass him so I know clearly what I am hearing. ..sorry BT/OPENREACH your claim is false. They goner have to prove what job type he was doing at that time & match it in all videos, and I am very confident what I am saying will not match up.
BT/OPENREACH are trying to cover this up, but wait till experts gets hold of those files.
if what BT/OPENREACH saying is true, then show the world proof & prove me wrong. Even if what BT/OPENREACH is saying is true, YOU STILL CAN'T DO THAT, he is still Interrupting a live line which is in use. This can cause "disruption" along with data corruption.
Your not supposed to intercept & capture data in that fashion for your own personal use. This is still a customer line which they are paying for including line rental.
So is BT/OPENREACH saying he is allowed this data for free. ..I don'ts think so. ...unless he is on a coop which he is clearly not, as no words are spoken into the hand held tester.
If BT/OPENREACH are saying he is allowed to put he's hand held tester on the line and listen in, If that was true why not do it from the street, or right outside the customer address. ..What's the difference. Not a lot, as it is the same line rental just a different location.
So what BT/OPENREACH are saying does not wash. Pull another excuse so I can post it here and prove you wrong for all to see.
This is a crime & like the Met Police said when I dial 101, the Met Police said two managers are responsible.
BT/OPENREACH you are now protecting the two managers, because I sent another Email in the last 3 days explaining this.
MET POLICE: The two high ranking managers it is they "responsibility" when first informed. NOTE: There was already two Events of listening-in regardless of what BT/OPENREACH is claiming when first email was sent.
The first time I caught someone listening-in to customer call the high ranking manager took that responsibility and removed him from the company. He also did not claim it was something else, because he already knows what on the MDF. But when informing two high ranking managers nothing seems to have happened.
There are other events that was never logged.
And let me make it clear YOU STILL CAN'T DO THAT it's a "LIVE" in-progress line and must not be interfere with or intercepted for reasons given above.
UPDATE: only I can explain what is going on in all videos in great detail, BT/OPENREACH can't they are not there, their are just looking at a video & claiming its something else. In a court of law BT/OPENREACH have no say in this matter whatsoever, because you have to be present onsite witnessing wants going on, this applies to non logged events also, and only I and the person committing the offence can explain this.
BT/OPENREACH put out your statement in writing somewhere for all to see so I can prove you wrong. You can not view video and say this is happening, your not there I am.
BT mobile has been disable. ..proof their are aware.
If I lived near Fulham Exchange, the first thing I would do is ask BT/OPENREACH for a back dated phone bill to match those date & timed videos if I think that is your conversation, then take them to court.
It seem their are now aware of the data files also. ...Let's see what happens in the next few days.
click tab bottom right page two.