Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Palemoon Browser  (Read 400 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ErolTopic starter

Palemoon Browser
« on: December 14, 2014, 11:19:45 AM »
http://www.palemoon.org/sourcecode.shtml

An Amiga version of this browser would be cool..  would it be possible?
 

Offline Linde

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Mar 2004
  • Posts: 457
    • Show only replies by Linde
    • http://hata.zor.org/
Re: Palemoon Browser
« Reply #1 on: December 14, 2014, 01:00:54 PM »
Why? With the build prerequisites (VS, DX SDK, Mozilla build tools) it seems like an awful candidate for porting. So much, in fact, that the Linux port is maintained as a separate project.

Looking at the feature list, the only feature that really stands out is that it's "optimized for modern processors", which of course is a disadvantage in running it on any Amiga or Amiga-like.

Admittedly, I've never run Pale Moon, so I have no idea what its advantages really are, but given their focus on the Windows platform and modern processors it does seem like the worst of the modern open source browsers to port to the Amiga.
 

Offline ErolTopic starter

Re: Palemoon Browser
« Reply #2 on: December 14, 2014, 03:08:35 PM »
I guess we have timberwolf which is a port of Firefox.

what happened with IBrowse and Aweb?
 

Offline Ancalimon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2002
  • Posts: 520
  • Country: 00
    • Show only replies by Ancalimon
    • http://www.myspace.com/orhunmusic
Re: Palemoon Browser
« Reply #3 on: December 14, 2014, 03:29:07 PM »
I think everyone that has the skills should concentrate on a single browser that has proper javascript.
A4000T, 604e@400&060@66, 128MB+16MB+Zorram256, CVisionPPC, VLabMotion, Toccata, XSurf100&RapidRoad, Prisma Megamix

A1200, Blizzard060@50, 256MB, Blizzard IV SCSI, FastATA mk4
 

Offline vxm

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Apr 2012
  • Posts: 59
    • Show only replies by vxm
Re: Palemoon Browser
« Reply #4 on: December 14, 2014, 04:13:11 PM »
Quote from: Erol;779781
An Amiga version of this browser would be cool..  would it be possible?
This may be complicated. According to its main features, it is optimized for modern processors.
 

Offline chris

Re: Palemoon Browser
« Reply #5 on: December 16, 2014, 11:19:14 AM »
Quote from: Erol;779781
http://www.palemoon.org/sourcecode.shtml

An Amiga version of this browser would be cool..  would it be possible?


As far as I can tell, it's basically Firefox and it's designed for Windows, so forget it.
"Miracles we do at once, the impossible takes a little longer" - AJS on Hyperion
Avatar picture is Tabitha by Eric W Schwartz
 

Offline chris

Re: Palemoon Browser
« Reply #6 on: December 16, 2014, 11:20:27 AM »
Quote from: Ancalimon;779793
I think everyone that has the skills should concentrate on a single browser that has proper javascript.


If anybody wants to lend a hand with NetSurf's Javascript support, I'm sure it will be appreciated. http://www.netsurf-browser.org/contact/
"Miracles we do at once, the impossible takes a little longer" - AJS on Hyperion
Avatar picture is Tabitha by Eric W Schwartz
 

Offline wawrzon

Re: Palemoon Browser
« Reply #7 on: December 16, 2014, 11:49:35 AM »
Quote from: Erol;779791
I guess we have timberwolf which is a port of Firefox.


on amiga we dont have anything like that. its on os4.

Quote
what happened with IBrowse and Aweb?


nothing, they are where they have been left.
 

Offline Ancalimon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2002
  • Posts: 520
  • Country: 00
    • Show only replies by Ancalimon
    • http://www.myspace.com/orhunmusic
Re: Palemoon Browser
« Reply #8 on: December 16, 2014, 01:55:08 PM »
Quote from: chris;779927
If anybody wants to lend a hand with NetSurf's Javascript support, I'm sure it will be appreciated. http://www.netsurf-browser.org/contact/


The only modern browser we have on classic. The only thing it's missing is Javascript and some optimization. But I am able to use the facebook mobile and chat with friends. It's just that you have to refresh to see if you received any replies to your messages :)
A4000T, 604e@400&060@66, 128MB+16MB+Zorram256, CVisionPPC, VLabMotion, Toccata, XSurf100&RapidRoad, Prisma Megamix

A1200, Blizzard060@50, 256MB, Blizzard IV SCSI, FastATA mk4
 

Offline QuikSanz

Re: Palemoon Browser
« Reply #9 on: December 16, 2014, 03:53:27 PM »
@Erol,

I think it was BigGun that was on a team trying to update AWeb. He said it was a dead end because of the way it was written.

Chris
 

Offline x303

Re: Palemoon Browser
« Reply #10 on: December 16, 2014, 04:22:01 PM »
Quote from: Linde;779785
Admittedly, I've never run Pale Moon, so I have no idea what its advantages really are, but given their focus on the Windows platform and modern processors it does seem like the worst of the modern open source browsers to port to the Amiga.

1) You can ask your question anytime and you get a sensible answer within 24 hours. Try that with mozilla.

2) It's much faster when using WebGL, compared to firefox (and waterfox).
 

Offline Linde

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Mar 2004
  • Posts: 457
    • Show only replies by Linde
    • http://hata.zor.org/
Re: Palemoon Browser
« Reply #11 on: December 17, 2014, 03:47:01 PM »
Quote from: x303;779952
1) You can ask your question anytime and you get a sensible answer within 24 hours. Try that with mozilla.

So if you go through with the substantial change to the codebase required to get this running on Amiga, at which point it will basically be a different browser, you will also get this level of support?

Also, have you actually tried to get support for your Mozilla product questions? They have their own IRC network with support channels, their own forums, and unofficial support is ubiquitous.

Quote from: x303;779952
2) It's much faster when using WebGL, compared to firefox (and waterfox).

What makes you think that an Amiga operating system could benefit from this? WebGL at all would be a good start.