Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Amiga Kit Amiga Store Hollywood MAL AMIStore App Store A600 Memory

AuthorTopic: C= Trade Mark Has A New Daddy  (Read 7086 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline dammy

C= Trade Mark Has A New Daddy
« on: December 29, 2011, 04:26:33 AM »
http://www.commodore-amiga.org/en/forum/27-commodore-usa/11229-commodore-trademark-has-a-new-daddy--#11229

Hope you all invested in the popcorn futures.  2012 is going to be a wild year.
Dammy

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Arix-OS/414578091930728
Unless otherwise noted, I speak only for myself.
 

Offline commodorejohn

Re: C= Trade Mark Has A New Daddy
« Reply #1 on: December 29, 2011, 04:57:35 AM »
Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.
Computers: Amiga 1200, DEC VAXStation 4000/60, DEC MicroPDP-11/73
Synthesizers: Roland JX-10/MT-32/D-10, Oberheim Matrix-6, Yamaha DX7/FB-01, Korg MS-20 Mini, Ensoniq Mirage/SQ-80, Sequential Circuits Prophet-600, Hohner String Performer

"\'Legacy code\' often differs from its suggested alternative by actually working and scaling." - Bjarne Stroustrup
 

Offline dammy

Re: C= Trade Mark Has A New Daddy
« Reply #2 on: December 29, 2011, 05:28:34 AM »
Quote from: commodorejohn;673347
Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.


You wished. :rofl:
Dammy

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Arix-OS/414578091930728
Unless otherwise noted, I speak only for myself.
 

Offline persia

Re: C= Trade Mark Has A New Daddy
« Reply #3 on: December 29, 2011, 02:52:34 PM »
So Barry force the two companies into bankruptcy?  Pretty mean spirited, but I suppose you have to be ruthless in the face of the competition.  Part of why Microsoft was dominant was because of it's ruthlessness.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

What we\'re witnessing is the sad, lonely crowing of that last, doomed cock.
 

Offline Matt_H

Re: C= Trade Mark Has A New Daddy
« Reply #4 on: December 29, 2011, 04:14:37 PM »
Quote from: persia;673379
So Barry force the two companies into bankruptcy?  Pretty mean spirited, but I suppose you have to be ruthless in the face of the competition.  Part of why Microsoft was dominant was because of it's ruthlessness.


Well, it's not like those two companies were the pinnacle of business competence. Have they shipped anything in the past 3 years?

I will now resume my position on the sidelines. Not getting involved with this Commodore USA stuff.
 

Offline dammy

Re: C= Trade Mark Has A New Daddy
« Reply #5 on: December 29, 2011, 04:25:33 PM »
Quote from: Matt_H;673395
Well, it's not like those two companies were the pinnacle of business competence. Have they shipped anything in the past 3 years?


I wouldn't be surprised if the SEC does an investigation of those now defunct companies.  Oh well, on to bigger and better things under the C= name.
Dammy

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Arix-OS/414578091930728
Unless otherwise noted, I speak only for myself.
 

Offline persia

Re: C= Trade Mark Has A New Daddy
« Reply #6 on: December 29, 2011, 04:59:22 PM »
Unless they had some kind of overseas operation they probably are out of the SEC's jurisdiction...

But I don't begrudge C=USA's use of lawyers to get it's way, the IT industries leaders (Apple & Microsoft) spend the equivalent of a third world country's GDP on Lawyers.  It's all part of the game, and the fact that Barry was able to play the game speaks well for C=USA.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

What we\'re witnessing is the sad, lonely crowing of that last, doomed cock.
 

Offline dammy

Re: C= Trade Mark Has A New Daddy
« Reply #7 on: December 29, 2011, 05:05:20 PM »
Quote from: persia;673416
Unless they had some kind of overseas operation they probably are out of the SEC's jurisdiction...


No, they were filing quarterly reports with the SEC, and their stock was on the pink sheet so SEC has some legal authority in this matter.
Dammy

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Arix-OS/414578091930728
Unless otherwise noted, I speak only for myself.
 

Offline number6

Re: C= Trade Mark Has A New Daddy
« Reply #8 on: March 10, 2012, 05:10:11 AM »
Quote from: dammy;673422
No, they were filing quarterly reports with the SEC, and their stock was on the pink sheet so SEC has some legal authority in this matter.



I'll assume it was meant to be humorous when Leo's response to why CUSA is still paying licensing fees if they were "the new daddy" was:

Quote
No, they were announcements on the possibility of announcements not the actual announcements.


source

#6
 

Offline number6

Re: C= Trade Mark Has A New Daddy
« Reply #9 on: March 27, 2012, 03:05:26 PM »
@thread

Quote
C=Holdings B.V. v. Asiarim Corporation et al


quite a lot of new documents filed

#6
 

Offline number6

Re: C= Trade Mark Has A New Daddy
« Reply #10 on: April 12, 2012, 03:28:02 PM »
@thread

Brief summary, current as of today, posted courtesy Barry Altman:

C=Holdings B.V. v. Asiarim Corporation et al

No sooner was this posted than another new document dated yesterday has been posted:

April 11, 2012

#6
 

Offline number6

Re: C= Trade Mark Has A New Daddy
« Reply #11 on: July 07, 2012, 04:07:00 PM »
@thread

Once again, not all docs are listed on the website the day they are filed, so we have another new onslaught of docs appearing now.
9 new ones since the last appeared in April, but 1 not available electronically.

source

Enjoy!

#6
 

Offline persia

Re: C= Trade Mark Has A New Daddy
« Reply #12 on: July 07, 2012, 05:46:07 PM »
« Last Edit: July 07, 2012, 06:09:28 PM by persia »
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

What we\'re witnessing is the sad, lonely crowing of that last, doomed cock.
 

Offline vox

Re: C= Trade Mark Has A New Daddy
« Reply #13 on: August 14, 2012, 08:52:07 PM »
Quote from: number6;699341
@thread

Once again, not all docs are listed on the website the day they are filed, so we have another new onslaught of docs appearing now.
9 new ones since the last appeared in April, but 1 not available electronically.

source

Enjoy!

#6


So who owns what now?
Future Acube and MOS supporter, fi di good, nothing fi di unprofessionals. Learn it harder way! http://www.youtube.com/user/rasvoja and https://www.facebook.com/rasvoja
 

Offline Optimus

Re: C= Trade Mark Has A New Daddy
« Reply #14 on: December 27, 2012, 10:27:53 PM »
Anyone know what happened with this?