Well, I think it is a stack of paper. Otherwise
Fleecy or someone would have told us something like.."we are working on OS5". And somehow I
cannot believe OS5 could exist in any form
considering OS4 isnt even done yet. But OS5
isnt going to be based on OS4 anyway,
some says. It will have TAO tech. Whether this
tech is *in* control or *under* control (regarding OS5) is the question. In the beginning Intent
was supposed to be the skeleton of OS5.
But Intent doesnt support memory-protection
and wont in the feature either, so this plan was
scraped (?). Now it would be a waste to not make
use of Intent in some form as alot of developing
and time has been put into it. So probably it will sit
on top of OS5 like it does elsewhere. So again, what will be the skeleton of OS5 ? Linux? QNX ? or pherhaps OS4.x ?. What about the platform-independence ? Maybe there will be *some*
platform independence in the form of a player.
But FULL platform independence ?
