Not exactly. This work pre dated OS4. I never released it at the time because in fixing a few bugs (and doubtless introducing new ones) I broke compatibility with a few applications. Most notably some of the better demos. I wrote entire suites of tests and can honestly say the driver honoured the API but there exists a corpus of software that relied on some obscure undocumented and likely accidental side effects of the original code. And while the improved performance in synthetic tests was nice, the gains were marginal in most games because the bottlenecks where elsewhere (esp. on ppc).
And that's the moral of this story. Optimising the %&$#?@!%&$#?@!%&$#?@!%&$#?@! out of a single small area often leaves you with little to show for it other than more bugs than you started with. None of the fixes to the v4 drawing calls mattered for existing software except to my projects, and they were still broken / unimplemented in the other drivers, so my software was left running on P2 when voodoo was fast becoming the norm. MiniGL went from v3 api calls to v5 (OS4 only) rendering those fixes irrelevant for most applications.
I had marginally faster minigl 1.5 / heretic 2 / glquake and a lot of wrecked elude demos.
I'd be happy to release it, but it isn't up to me. Warp3D belongs to Hyperion and is now part of OS4. It's also deprecated so they may be ok with it. Either way, I'd have to ask.
you have had access to the sources and been working on a w3d driver predating os4? wow!
now: dont understand me wrong, ï dont expect wonders and also im not making demands. i was actually rather commenting on a general attitude to keep features for os4 even though they could be ported to 68k, or even opening them altogether, even if it was just for educational reasons or for code preservation. this might been legitimate as long as there have been slightest chance for securing an own commercial niche. but it seems for os4 such a chance if ever must have exist only at the very beginning.
now, this attitude seems to change now a little. at least when it comes to contributors, such as in case of the topic here, olsens roadshow or os4 mui maintainers. probably it is plain impossible to prevent such a notion, whoever would like to do it, as soon as it gains own dynamic. i wonder if some day at least the sources of improvements will be published, even if the original ones will remain locked off.