Hans_ wrote:
How long ago was that? And which version of wxWidgets were you using.
As of the first quarter of 2007. At the time we were using the latest version released (primarily Windows platform), but I can't recall the number right now.
Hans_ wrote:
I'm not interested in wxWidgets for the purpose of porting more Linux apps over; I don't care for ports. I'm looking for something that I can use to write new software so that I can easily port it between multiple platform. I don't like GTK or Qt, and wouldn't consider using either of them.
Aha, well now that your goals are stated clearly, I understand your logic. Yes, wxWidgets makes most sense compared to the other two (although the latest QT is technologically more advanced, albeit much harder to port), especially in light of the lack of another good and readily available choice.
Hans_ wrote:
The wxWidgets-aos project compiles on 68k via GCC, so it being C++ is not an issue.
Compiles is one thing, runs properly (aka the compiler outputs the right code for what it was asked to compile) is another. I only brought up this matter since the state of the existing project was unknown to me, and this could have been a big issue. If it also runs properly, then that's good news indeed. That makes it even easier.
Hans_ wrote:
Every toolkit has its quirks... Someone else told me that it was the easiest to use GUI system that he'd tried
Yes, indeed each can have its own issues. Although personally I found wxWidgets obtuse (even in naming conventions, like what's a frame or a window), but then again I was comparing with Cocoa...
Hans_ wrote:
As for the size; it is biggish, but...The size is something I'm prepared to live with because I don't have the time to build completely separate GUIs for each platform... Why not use something that's already there?
Your logic is... logical :-) I only brought up the size matter, not in the sense of bloat, but more of work needed to do the porting (I hadn't checked the source to see how portable it would be for the Amiga's case, so I used generic intuition, since usually bigger is more complex and thus usually harder, no?) But compared to the other choices it's smaller, and like you verified it's already partially working, so in this case and unless there's nothing smaller and more viable, its size is 'good enough'. So you look set to go.
On a personal note, I'd love to work on porting GNUstep to the Amiga one day. "Nuttin' like it!"