Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Has anyone used AmigaOS XL?  (Read 2101 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline AntiriadTopic starter

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Jan 2005
  • Posts: 62
    • Show only replies by Antiriad
Has anyone used AmigaOS XL?
« on: January 10, 2005, 08:59:42 PM »
I read this article.

http://www.osnews.com/story.php?news_id=604&page=1

It was dated back in 2002. It looks like the only Amiga OS distribution that runs on a native x86 Architecture but cannot run PPC applications.

http://www.amithlon.com/

Is this OS system still Alive?

Which is the best distribution so far....

Thanks

Mike





 

Offline 4pLaY

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2002
  • Posts: 779
  • Country: no
  • Gender: Male
    • Show only replies by 4pLaY
    • https://www.amigalife.org
Re: Has anyone used AmigaOS XL?
« Reply #1 on: January 10, 2005, 09:13:36 PM »
No its dead thanx to internal was between the people who made it im afraid.

Offline Matt_H

Re: Has anyone used AmigaOS XL?
« Reply #2 on: January 10, 2005, 10:57:30 PM »
I never really understood the difference between Amithlon and OS XL. Was OS XL just another name for the tweaked version of 3.9 that Amithlon ran?
 

Offline Linchpin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2003
  • Posts: 1483
    • Show only replies by Linchpin
    • http://www.systemmedic.co.uk
Re: Has anyone used AmigaOS XL?
« Reply #3 on: January 10, 2005, 11:20:06 PM »
I have it... Its the fastest (by far) amigaOS i have ever used.
WinUAE Only... OS3.9 with 512mb ZIII ram ;)
 

  • Guest
Re: Has anyone used AmigaOS XL?
« Reply #4 on: January 10, 2005, 11:31:49 PM »
Quote

LinchpiN wrote:
I have it... Its the fastest (by far) amigaOS i have ever used.


Faster than amithlon?

Ain't OSXL just QNX with UAE?
 

Offline adolescent

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2003
  • Posts: 3056
    • Show only replies by adolescent
Re: Has anyone used AmigaOS XL?
« Reply #5 on: January 11, 2005, 12:49:58 AM »
Amithlon was fast for it's day, but I think the newer WinUAE JIT has caught up.
Time to move on.  Bye Amiga.org.  :(
 

Offline itix

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2002
  • Posts: 2380
    • Show only replies by itix
Re: Has anyone used AmigaOS XL?
« Reply #6 on: January 11, 2005, 12:57:20 AM »
Quote
Ain't OSXL just QNX with UAE?

Here is some information about it: http://amiga.emugaming.com/emulators/amigaosxl.html

It seems it was only QNX + UAE without chipset emulation. I don't see difference to Amithlon...

My Amigas: A500, Mac Mini and PowerBook
 

Offline that_punk_guy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2002
  • Posts: 4526
    • Show only replies by that_punk_guy
Re: Has anyone used AmigaOS XL?
« Reply #7 on: January 11, 2005, 01:05:30 AM »
Quote

itix wrote:
Quote

Ain't OSXL just QNX with UAE?


Here is some information about it: http://amiga.emugaming.com/emulators/amigaosxl.html

It seems it was only QNX + UAE without chipset emulation. I don't see difference to Amithlon...



IIRC the only difference is that OSXL sacrifices compatibility for speed.
 

  • Guest
Re: Has anyone used AmigaOS XL?
« Reply #8 on: January 11, 2005, 01:11:41 AM »
Quote

itix wrote:
Quote

Ain't OSXL just QNX with UAE?


Here is some information about it: http://amiga.emugaming.com/emulators/amigaosxl.html

It seems it was only QNX + UAE without chipset emulation. I don't see difference to Amithlon...



From what I understand, OSXL is the complete QNX RTP Desktop OS with UAE, just like we can run Windows XP with UAE.

Amithlon boots a Linux kernel, not a full OS.
 

Offline henribarbu

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Join Date: Jan 2005
  • Posts: 16
    • Show only replies by henribarbu
    • http://users.skynet.be/henri.chapelle
Re: Has anyone used AmigaOS XL?
« Reply #9 on: January 24, 2005, 04:07:00 PM »
Amithlon  = linux 2.4 + something
Amiga OS XL = QNX + something

By the way, Amithlon still run fine,
I've tested it with a Fujitsu-Siemens laptop.
Openpci and AHI drivers are still developed for it.

Actualy, UAE (E-uae) is faster on my box (mainly due to use of vesa drivers with amithlon). When I use Abrowse with Amithlon, I never use the up and down keys or I have to wait some secs till the end of scrolling.
Anyway, neither Amithlon or AmigaosXL supports AGA or Paula.
If you want to play old games, you need UAE.
As both Amithlon and XL are not FULL OS, UAE is more suitable and is easily integrated with you current OS.


 

Offline Kronos

  • Resident blue troll
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 4017
    • Show only replies by Kronos
    • http://www.SteamDraw.de
Re: Has anyone used AmigaOS XL?
« Reply #10 on: January 24, 2005, 04:22:35 PM »
Tstst it's so easy....

AmigaXL == UAE for QNX
Amithlon == tailor-made JIT on a minimal Linux-kernel, with direct acces to the host HW.

AmigaOS-XL == package containig AmigaXL, Amithlon, OS3.9, ONX, AmigaWriter and ArtEffect3.

@adolescent

Amithlon at that time reached about twice the speed on pure calculation, GFX-acceses was a complete leaque of it's own du to directly writting into the AGP-card instead of an emulated Z3-card which was than copied into the AGP-card by the host OS.

Removing most of the chipset support also meant that syncronsation wasn't an issue anymore, which is the major reason for the better JIT-performance, and useing native x86-code in GFX-drivers and such gave another boost, so you can still bet my hairy palm  :lol: that Amithlon will easily beat UAE on the same HW (if the HW is supported by one of the Amithlon-kernels).
1. Make an announcment.
2. Wait a while.
3. Check if it can actually be done.
4. Wait for someone else to do it.
5. Start working on it while giving out hillarious progress-reports.
6. Deny that you have ever announced it
7. Blame someone else