Welcome, Guest. Please
login
or
register
.
Forums
Forums
Board
Topic
Home
Today's Posts
Gallery
Login
Register
Amiga.org
»
Amiga computer related discussion
»
Amiga Hardware Issues and discussion
»
XSURF 100 - Poor Performance?
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Author
Topic: XSURF 100 - Poor Performance? (Read 448 times)
Description:
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Ancalimon
Hero Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 522
Country:
XSURF 100 - Poor Performance?
«
on:
March 17, 2024, 11:18:35 AM »
Using the 060-66 and OS3.2+Easynet Pro or OS3.9+Genesis, I get less than 50kb/sec. Using 604e 400 and Os4.1FE, I get around 200kb/s~250kb/s downloading from Turran FTP.
Is there any trick to increase speed?
Logged
A4000T, 604e@400&060@66, 128MB+16MB+Zorram256, CVisionPPC, VLabMotion, Toccata, XSurf100&RapidRoad, Prisma Megamix
A1200, Blizzard060@50, 256MB, Blizzard IV SCSI, FastATA mk4
Boing-ball
Sr. Member
Join Date: Nov 2023
Posts: 452
Country:
Thanked: 18 times
Gender:
Re: XSURF 100 - Poor Performance?
«
Reply #1 on:
March 17, 2024, 05:24:39 PM »
You do have the jumper set correctly on the X-Surf? I.e not set to Z2?
Logged
The following users thanked this post:
Ancalimon
Ancalimon
Hero Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 522
Country:
Re: XSURF 100 - Poor Performance?
«
Reply #2 on:
March 17, 2024, 05:38:00 PM »
Just took a jumper off from the card. Will try again
Logged
A4000T, 604e@400&060@66, 128MB+16MB+Zorram256, CVisionPPC, VLabMotion, Toccata, XSurf100&RapidRoad, Prisma Megamix
A1200, Blizzard060@50, 256MB, Blizzard IV SCSI, FastATA mk4
Boing-ball
Sr. Member
Join Date: Nov 2023
Posts: 452
Country:
Thanked: 18 times
Gender:
Re: XSURF 100 - Poor Performance?
«
Reply #3 on:
March 17, 2024, 06:57:09 PM »
If you have taken the jumper off. Then it’s set to Z3 (Zorro 3) which is the correct speed setting for the A3000 and A4000.
I use a X-Surf100 with the RoadShow TCP/IP stack. Runs fast!
Logged
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Amiga.org
»
Amiga computer related discussion
»
Amiga Hardware Issues and discussion
»
XSURF 100 - Poor Performance?
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...