Author Topic: X1000 looking good on paper? (Read 22978 times)

tone007 · « **Reply #1 on:** October 15, 2010, 06:01:57 PM »

Satanists!

..kidding.

tone007 · « **Reply #2 on:** October 15, 2010, 11:04:23 PM »

Sounds like someone mistook their own ASSuming for someone else's implying!

tone007 · « **Reply #3 on:** October 15, 2010, 11:29:56 PM »

Quote from: wawrzon;584962

herp

Keep your raisins to yourself.

tone007 · « **Reply #4 on:** October 16, 2010, 02:07:40 AM »

Hey, this is about the only way the X1000 could look good on paper. (Hope someone didn't beat me to that one.)

tone007 · « **Reply #5 on:** October 22, 2010, 02:34:56 PM »

YOH I FOUND A WHOLE FLOCK OF X1000S

tone007 · « **Reply #6 on:** October 22, 2010, 03:40:23 PM »

I think the paper motherboard photograph is a good commentary on the desperation felt by OS4 users in regards to hardware availability. Very profound. If the man in the photo stood up, you'd see the tears in his eyes.

tone007 · « **Reply #7 on:** October 23, 2010, 01:36:41 AM »

Luckily the old 32 bit apps run nicely on most 64 bit operating systems. Even XP64 works well enough. If you've got tons of RAM, you can't get away with 32 bit.

Author Topic: X1000 looking good on paper? (Read 22978 times)

tone007

Re: X1000 looking good on paper?

tone007

Re: X1000 looking good on paper?

tone007

Re: X1000 looking good on paper?

tone007

Re: X1000 looking good on paper?

tone007

Re: X1000 looking good on paper?

tone007

Re: X1000 looking good on paper?

tone007

Re: X1000 looking good on paper?

tone007

Re: X1000 looking good on paper?