Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: AROS VS HAIKU  (Read 3280 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline bloodline

  • Master Sock Abuser
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 12113
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.troubled-mind.com
Re: AROS VS HAIKU
« on: April 27, 2007, 07:43:41 PM »
Quote

Darth_X wrote:
Are we forgetting anything? ;-)

How about POSIX compliance?


From that point of view, Haiku has a greater potential future... since it has unrestricted access to Linux/UNIX software.

AROS, on the other hand will always have my heart... if I want POSIX... I'll use MacOSX ;-)

Offline bloodline

  • Master Sock Abuser
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 12113
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.troubled-mind.com
Re: AROS VS HAIKU
« Reply #1 on: May 11, 2007, 01:18:11 PM »
Quote

Kathyone wrote:
  When I said the deal about Mac not be a microkernel, I meant it has a mixed kernel heritage. OSX is mach plus BSD.  BSD is monolithic.  QNX by contrast is not.  


You say that like Microkernel = Good, Monolithic Kernel = Bad.

Also you seem to think that Microkernel would run faster and use less memory... both of these assumptions are wrong, in fact a Microkernel sufferes badly from context swithing times (i.e. it requires a faster CPU) and uses much more memory... it is these two flaws which resulted in Apple (or rather NeXT) making a hybrid between Mach and BSD... that way they get the best of both worlds.

MacOSX does run on the iPhone... that suggests it can run on limited spec machines...