new ixemul V62.1 for 68k.

[kolla]

I suggest respecting local variable HOME before using global HOME.

[kolla]

OWB is another example, iirc.

I agree, fork and change name - let it be possible to have both old working pre v50 and this new experimental stuff on the system at once.

Was v49.26 ever released?

[kolla]

Developers that don't know the difference between /mydir on amiga and un*x - how reassuring - not

You can't say whether /mydir is un*ix or amiga path out of context, as it's valid path in both - the un*x equivalent of amiga /mydir is ../mydir and the amiga equivalent of un*x /mydir is mydir: - isn't it obvious?

I'm happy that I'm as a user no longer have to mess around with this since the amiga systems I use so often that running un*x software is relevant, are emulated ontop of linux anyways. Via scripts, mapping of /proc and /sys inside UAE, named pipes etc I can even control lots of the linux host operations from within UAE if I want/need that.

[kolla]

Why would I want ffmpeg on any of my 68k systems?
Why all this talk about MorphOS and OS4 when this thread is about 68k ixemul?

[kolla]

then i show that MOS Version that use libnix in ffmpeg is incomplete and ffmpeg in 68k support more codecs and is complete with ffplay.

Why would anyone use ffplay on 68k?

If it's a real 68k, it is simply too slow, and if it's an emulated 68k, the host systems have much more capable native variants.

I hope he know that its the easiest of the world to add a func that a ixemul task can switch of translation to unix paths.so ixemul handle files in same way libnix do, but ixemul support lots more unix funcs and allow teh port of Unix programs more easy.

And wy a ixemul program can have no amiga GUI or amiga like code, i see too no reason.
and that ixemul is slower as libnix, is also not possible, because boith libs use Linux API code.

This makes no sense to me.
If you have time and resources to actually code AmigaOS specific additions such as a GUI, you definetly also have time and resources to fix the code so that it doesnt have to rely on ixemul for something trivial as converting paths. Anyways, I thought the point was to mimic NetBSD, not Linux. At least that is what the docs that come with ixemul say.

[kolla]

amistuff have add nice features to ffplay.you can save a picture with key s.show me videoplayers that can do it easy.

s in mplayer as well, it's always been there.

Also in ffplay you can rewind or forward in Video files with cursor keys.Show me player that can do that so easy ?

Again, mplayer always did this, and more.

and time will show, what amiga features ffplay/ffmpeg get more.I plan a easy to Video recording/editing Software in amiblitz too.there is also no problem to do that with ixemul.

But more importantly - there is no problem doing it without ixemul.

From my point of view, as a user, ixemul is mostly an annoyance, it's a last resort for quick&dirty ports - using it as some sort of framework for real amiga software just seems insane.

Oh, and please stop using "Linux" all over the place, it makes me cringe as there's nothing Linux about it - use posix, or un*x or something.

[kolla]

PS. When you install Amithlon there is no native variant, native variant is 68k program.

Why people still use Amithlon is also beyond me, it was a nice idea and all, but in its current unsupported state it doesnt make much sense, IMO.

[kolla]

Amithlon run on much and fast Hardware.The Kernel is opensource, so it can port to any Hardware.

The last Kernel update was here.YOu see its from 2006 support SATA and PCIe GFX Cards.i think you know that AMithlon since 2002 was dead, but you see 2006 last update.

http://www.garycvl.f2s.com/amithlon.html

And for the OS you can use too a enhanced 68k AOS as AFA OSor port AROS to it.

I'm fully aware of Amithlon updates, I bought it myself and used it for quite a while, but at some point is stopped being practical and simply using UAE was a much better option. Btw, the links on the page you link to no longer work, the linux kernel is from 2004 with just some modules from 2006.

[kolla]

i click now again on the link, it work.

What I meant was that the download links don't work.