Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: ARM vs. PPC (why continue the PPC path?)  (Read 16709 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline dammy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 2828
    • Show all replies
Re: ARM vs. PPC (why continue the PPC path?)
« on: February 16, 2012, 02:30:04 PM »
Quote from: mongo;680650
Really?

http://cache.freescale.com/files/32bit/doc/fact_sheet/T4240T4160FS.pdf?fpsp=1

12 cores, 1.8 GHz, 6.0 DMIPS/MHz per core not good enough for you?


For embedded system, it's great for networking.  As far as going head to head with the A15, I have a feeling it's going to come up way short.  So what are the prices on the T4240?
Dammy

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Arix-OS/414578091930728
Unless otherwise noted, I speak only for myself.
 

Offline dammy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 2828
    • Show all replies
Re: ARM vs. PPC (why continue the PPC path?)
« Reply #1 on: February 17, 2012, 01:28:19 PM »
Quote from: mongo;680695
A15 is about 40% faster than A9. That gives you about 3.5 DMIPS/MHz.


So what is the price on the T4240?  We can go on and on the exact performance that gives one or the other the upper hand, it boils down what is cheap and powerful enough to make the average user happy.   Now as far as OS4, I would prefer it to remain in PPCland.
Dammy

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Arix-OS/414578091930728
Unless otherwise noted, I speak only for myself.