Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Michael Jackson is NOT GUILTY  (Read 5199 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

  • Guest
Re: Michael Jackson is NOT GUILTY
« Reply #89 from previous page: June 28, 2005, 07:14:51 PM »
Quote

Wayne wrote:
C'mon guys.  I know I've had a bit of fun this morning, but we're stepping on the lines of good taste with the latest comments here folks.

Wayne


So anal sex with small furry animals is ok, but PMS isn't? ;-)
 

Offline x56h34

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2003
  • Posts: 2921
    • Show only replies by x56h34
Re: Michael Jackson is NOT GUILTY
« Reply #90 on: June 28, 2005, 07:15:26 PM »
@Wayne:

Yes, you are right. :-)
I just don't know when to stop. :oops:
 

  • Guest
Re: Michael Jackson is NOT GUILTY
« Reply #91 on: June 28, 2005, 07:16:48 PM »
I clearly said that I was involved, meaning I'm just as guilty as the rest...  All I'm asking now is that we reel in the language before it gets a little too far gone.  

BTW, it wasn't "PMS" that I was objecting to.

Wayne
 

  • Guest
Re: Michael Jackson is NOT GUILTY
« Reply #92 on: June 28, 2005, 07:39:50 PM »
@Wayne

I know, was just teasing. :-)
 

Offline CU_AMiGA

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2003
  • Posts: 1807
    • Show only replies by CU_AMiGA
Re: Michael Jackson is NOT GUILTY
« Reply #93 on: June 29, 2005, 12:48:44 PM »
Quote

mdma wrote:
Quote

CU_AMiGA wrote:
Quote

Wayne wrote:
I digress.  Go ahead and change them back.  I've made my point.  If you refuse to honor the request, that's up to you.  It just proves that maybe the perception you're trying to force on us of "uneducated idiot" perhaps isn't that far off the mark.  I just find it interesting to see that you and Sumner are indeed two different (if not inseperable) people.

Wayne


Hey Yo!

That's {bleep}! I am predicted good grades at college, and am planning on computer/office type of work.

Regards,


What are you still doing at college at 20? :-?

You should have left at 17/18.


Hey Yo!

Don't worry this is my last year at college (well, now finished actually). But you do get older students at colleges and Universities now.

Regards,
A1200D / AGA / B1260 / 64MB RAM / KS 3.1 / AOS 3.9 / 4GB HD
 

Offline CU_AMiGA

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2003
  • Posts: 1807
    • Show only replies by CU_AMiGA
Re: Michael Jackson is NOT GUILTY
« Reply #94 on: June 29, 2005, 12:50:45 PM »
Quote

cecilia wrote:
the next time any of you fellas start talking about how only women have PMS, i'll direct you to this thread (and all other threads that have been created by this silly silly boy).

just a little FYI
 :-P


Hey Yo!

...and what are your opinions of Wayne then, cecil? As he himself said he had much to blame as i have for this thread! ;-)

Regards,
A1200D / AGA / B1260 / 64MB RAM / KS 3.1 / AOS 3.9 / 4GB HD
 

  • Guest
Re: Michael Jackson is NOT GUILTY
« Reply #95 on: June 29, 2005, 01:26:42 PM »
Quote

..and what are your opinions of Wayne then, cecil? As he himself said he had much to blame as i have for this thread!

Their opinions are their opinions and I don't think you're going to like it if they're honest, but I do agree with others here.  

You REALLY need to stop crapflooding Amiga.org.  No one gives a flying {bleep} about "the great CU_Amiga" except you and your little group of friends (all of whom have been banned for being annoying and crapflooding as well).  

On the other hand, I think we all thank you for giving us yourself to laugh at for the last two days.

Wayne
 

Offline CU_AMiGA

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2003
  • Posts: 1807
    • Show only replies by CU_AMiGA
Re: Michael Jackson is NOT GUILTY
« Reply #96 on: June 29, 2005, 01:32:31 PM »
Quote

Wayne wrote:
[On the other hand, I think we all thank you for giving us yourself to laugh at for the last two days.


Hey Yo!

My pleasure! :-D I too have similar opinions about you too Wayne (about your current situation/dilema), but i dare not blurt them out here, as the relationship between us is already strained enough.

Regards,
A1200D / AGA / B1260 / 64MB RAM / KS 3.1 / AOS 3.9 / 4GB HD
 

  • Guest
Re: Michael Jackson is NOT GUILTY
« Reply #97 on: June 29, 2005, 01:33:26 PM »
Say "Hey Yo!" one more {edited by moderator} time.  I dare you.

 

Offline PMC

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2003
  • Posts: 2616
    • Show only replies by PMC
    • http://www.b3ta.com
Re: Michael Jackson is NOT GUILTY
« Reply #98 on: June 29, 2005, 01:37:34 PM »
Quote

CU_AMiGA wrote:
Quote

Wayne wrote:
[On the other hand, I think we all thank you for giving us yourself to laugh at for the last two days.


Hey Yo!

My pleasure! :-D I too have similar opinions about you too Wayne (about your current situation/dilema), but i dare not blurt them out here, as the relationship between us is already strained enough.

Regards,


Then why not have an open and frank discussion via pmail?
That way we can all be spared the embarrassment of seeing this on a public forum.
Cecilia for President
 

Offline Karlos

  • Sockologist
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 16867
  • Country: gb
  • Thanked: 4 times
    • Show only replies by Karlos
Re: Michael Jackson is NOT GUILTY
« Reply #99 on: June 29, 2005, 01:40:52 PM »
Quote
That way we can all be spared the embarrassment of seeing this on a public forum.


I dunno, it did give me a good laugh :-)
int p; // A
 

Offline CU_AMiGA

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2003
  • Posts: 1807
    • Show only replies by CU_AMiGA
Re: Michael Jackson is NOT GUILTY
« Reply #100 on: June 29, 2005, 01:41:20 PM »
Quote

PMC wrote:
Quote

CU_AMiGA wrote:
Quote

Wayne wrote:
[On the other hand, I think we all thank you for giving us yourself to laugh at for the last two days.


Hey Yo!

My pleasure! :-D I too have similar opinions about you too Wayne (about your current situation/dilema), but i dare not blurt them out here, as the relationship between us is already strained enough.

Regards,


Then why not have an open and frank discussion via pmail?
That way we can all be spared the embarrassment of seeing this on a public forum.


Hey Yo!

It was Wayne as well PMC, so i hope that's aimed at him too.

Regards,
A1200D / AGA / B1260 / 64MB RAM / KS 3.1 / AOS 3.9 / 4GB HD
 

  • Guest
Re: Michael Jackson is NOT GUILTY
« Reply #101 on: June 29, 2005, 01:41:38 PM »
Quote
Then why not have an open and frank discussion via pmail?

I'm sorry for the embarrassment, but in this situation it's best to show this in an open fashion.  He would just post any pmails he didn't like in public, or make wild claims of things that never happened.

The more he bleets on, the more I think he's really begging me to ban him so that he can finally be equal to his peers.

Wayne
 

Offline Karlos

  • Sockologist
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 16867
  • Country: gb
  • Thanked: 4 times
    • Show only replies by Karlos
Re: Michael Jackson is NOT GUILTY
« Reply #102 on: June 29, 2005, 01:45:19 PM »
Quote

Wayne wrote:

The more he bleets on, the more I think he's really begging me to ban him so that he can finally be equal to his peers.



I think he's more likely begging to feed the amiga.org kitty.

Know worra' mean, eh?
int p; // A
 

Offline PMC

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2003
  • Posts: 2616
    • Show only replies by PMC
    • http://www.b3ta.com
Re: Michael Jackson is NOT GUILTY
« Reply #103 on: June 29, 2005, 01:48:38 PM »
It just seems a right old fuss to make about a sig, but I agree that CU hasn't helped himself by adding more and more fuel to the fire.  

Cecilia for President
 

  • Guest
Re: Michael Jackson is NOT GUILTY
« Reply #104 on: June 29, 2005, 01:50:14 PM »
Sorry guys.  I've pretty much had it with the crapflooding here.  I've asked him to stop and he continues.

I've temporarily suspended at least three different IP numbers that he is using to continue the "takeover of Amiga.org".  Hopefully he'll take the hint and we can allow him back once he chills out a bit.

I know it's been funny, and I've laughed my ass off as well, but enough is enough.  Let's get back to talking about something besides the simply mediocre CU_Amiga please.

Wayne