DoomMaster's whereabouts

[TjLaZer]

Doomy,

Yes, The Amiga was slower, but the Amiga used custom coprocessor chips to aid the CPU, so in reality the Amiga was faster. That is why the games on the Amiga are better and smoother.  

From what I remember the Amiga needed to be slower anyway because of Video timing?  Been way to long...

[TjLaZer]

Doomy

The point is the Amiga had better coprocessor chips that aided the CPU better, faster, that is why when comparing a Amiga 500 to a Atari 520ST, the Amiga seemed faster, and had better games.  The blitter in the Amiga alone made a hugh difference.  Even comparing it to a Atari 520STE the Amiga 500 is superior.  Don't get mad, this is the harsh truth.  Of course you cannot compare ST ported games, as they both ran exactly the same expect for the sound, it was always better on the Amiga!

Come on man!  Even you admit the Atari ST is the second best computer of the 1980's!  What is the best again?

[TjLaZer]

Doomy, funny, if the ST was designed to do Mac emulation, why does it suck so bad at doing it?  Shapeshifter on the Amiga, a software only emulator, along with a 020, 030, 040 or 060 blows the doors off any Atari ST/TT Mac Emulator!

[TjLaZer]

Even though I love Atari's, I always agreed that the Amiga blew the doors off the Atari.

[TjLaZer]

Doomy,

Why do you say that?  Well we both like Amiga and Atari ST computers...