Oh no! Another "how should other people work" topic about AROS.
And another fork/split proposal. It seems the Amiga community can't live without splitting things in thousands pieces.
Well, for people that aren't aware of it, AROS has its own mission and definition, which is being "a lightweight, efficient and flexible desktop operating system, designed to help you make the most of your computer. It's an independent, portable and free project, aiming at being compatible with AmigaOS 3.1 at the API level (like Wine, unlike UAE), while improving on it in many areas".
Isn't it enough? Well, there are the ending lines too, "The source code is available under an open source license, which allows anyone to freely improve upon it" which formally and actually allow anyone willing to do his/her "better AROS" to take the code, modify it and reach the goal he/she likes.
So, having clear in mind that all in all AROS is a *hobbystic* project, the community can do different things with it:
1. just whining and claiming their opinion would be the best way to improve AROS
2. contribute with code to reach the common goal stated above.
3. take the existing code and improve upon it the way they like, just to become the new ruler of the world.
The direction is already here for the people that want to see it. The others may disagree, but please don't claim AROS is pointless or directionless anymore, as it is completely untrue.