Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Don King sues ESPN for 2.5 *billion*  (Read 958 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline T_BoneTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2002
  • Posts: 5124
    • Show only replies by T_Bone
    • http://www.amiga.org/userinfo.php?uid=1961
Don King sues ESPN for 2.5 *billion*
« on: January 13, 2005, 11:29:47 AM »
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=531&u=/ap/20050112/ap_on_sp_bo_ne/box_king_lawsuit&printer=1

Alright, I admit I'm a fan, and that he's entertained me, but everything said about the man is the sorry truth.

I hope this gets thrown out of court.

this space for rent
 

Offline T_BoneTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2002
  • Posts: 5124
    • Show only replies by T_Bone
    • http://www.amiga.org/userinfo.php?uid=1961
Re: Don King sues ESPN for 2.5 *billion*
« Reply #1 on: January 13, 2005, 12:40:18 PM »
Come to think of it, couldn't killing a man, then being convicted of killing a man, then sueing someone for saying you killed a man, be considered "profiting from your crime?"
this space for rent
 

Offline PMC

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2003
  • Posts: 2616
    • Show only replies by PMC
    • http://www.b3ta.com
Re: Don King sues ESPN for 2.5 *billion*
« Reply #2 on: January 13, 2005, 12:49:06 PM »
It's not slander if it's been proved in a court of law.  However, the language used should be picked carefully, as miscarriages of justice aren't unknown.

I'd be careful to point out that someone's "Been convicted of murder" rather than labelling them a "murderer".  After all, I wasn't there to witness the killing.
Cecilia for President
 

  • Guest
Re: Don King sues ESPN for 2.5 *billion*
« Reply #3 on: January 13, 2005, 01:37:58 PM »
Quote

PMC wrote:
It's not slander if it's been proved in a court of law.  However, the language used should be picked carefully, as miscarriages of justice aren't unknown.

I'd be careful to point out that someone's "Been convicted of murder" rather than labelling them a "murderer".  After all, I wasn't there to witness the killing.


Whereas I being the undiplomatic northerner I am, would just call that someone a murderer.  They could sue me if they wanted, but as we say up here, "You can't get blood from a stone!" ;-)
 

Offline sumner7

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2003
  • Posts: 1172
    • Show only replies by sumner7
Re: Don King sues ESPN for 2.5 *billion*
« Reply #4 on: January 13, 2005, 05:59:24 PM »
THE F - A CUP!
THE F - A CUP!
THE F - A CUP!

IT DON'T NEED NO DON :lol:
 

Offline Tigger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 1890
    • Show only replies by Tigger
Re: Don King sues ESPN for 2.5 *billion*
« Reply #5 on: January 13, 2005, 06:26:52 PM »
Quote

PMC wrote:
I'd be careful to point out that someone's "Been convicted of murder" rather than labelling them a "murderer".  After all, I wasn't there to witness the killing.


First of all they didnt call him a murderer, they said he had killed two people.  Thats not even up to debate, he didnt argue that on either case, the one he was convicted of murder and the one he got off on self defense, in both cases the issue was never whether Don killed them, but whether he had reason to do it.  Now in one case they decided it was self-defense (how he got that when shooting him in the back, I would guess is between him and John Gotti), but that doesnt mean he didnt kill the guy, it just means he doesnt have to go to jail for doing it.  This is a silly suit, he should be happy he's featured in sportscentury not suing them for the feature.  
   -Tig
Well you know I am scottish, so I like sheep alot.
     -Fleecy Moss, Gateway 2000 show