|
|
| time to code some lame stuff | ||
 |
||
| Previous Image | Next Image | ||
Description: stormc4, powericons & newcli with *[esc setup  (karlos , i take your config, thanks ).
Picture Stats: Views: 1757 Filesize: 153.7kB Height: 768 Width: 1024 Posted by: kas1e at November 01, 2005, 02:32:09 AM Image Linking Codes
|
||
| 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this picture. |
| kas1e Posts:430 
| January 23, 2008, 11:59:37 AM Counzeto, nope.. tests with StormC was only tests. Vague was done on vbcc/sasc + old version of golded. On final stage it was on winuae, reals amiga was used only for tests of speed and so on. |
| countzero Posts:1938 | November 13, 2007, 06:31:59 PM so this is the environment you coded the vague zine ? |
| 3246251196 Posts:334
| April 03, 2006, 03:30:03 AM ouch - the taboo GOTO methodology... |
| Karlos Posts:16867 | November 02, 2005, 09:50:55 PM Voiding returns is not necessary in any version of C, it's just for human reading purposes. In this case, printf() actually returns an int. If you do (void)printf("lo bob\n"); you are making it obvious that you are not interested in the return value or that you are ignoring it. Of course, just writing printf("lo bob\n"); is just as obvious IMHO :-) |
| 560SL Posts:197 | November 02, 2005, 07:53:18 PM "void for printf ? for what ?" Show that know what you're doing by ignoring return value from printf... sorry, just me being pedantic :O) "newline for the initial curly bracket!" ? ... this is religion dude! Will not even discuss the newline, it should be there. Period! :O) |
| kas1e Posts:430
| November 02, 2005, 05:21:16 PM @560sl void for printf ? for what ? and what about "newline for the initial curly bracket!" ? 2karlos yea, thanks. |
| Karlos Posts:16867 | November 01, 2005, 09:49:49 PM @Kas1e I dunno what you are coding but I suggest you forget about W3D_Vertex and use Warp3D v4 vertex array methods. You can define your own vertex format then, with a choice of coordinate, texture coordinate and colour formats. They are typically a good bit faster :-) BTW, there is nothing wrong with 'goto' used in the right context, even in C++ (provided you dont jump past any initialisers). |
| 560SL Posts:197 | November 01, 2005, 05:52:53 PM Aha! I can see those evil goto's from far, far away... And you missed a newline for the initial curly bracket! And, don't you know you should (void) those printf's? ;O) |