Apparently you haven't. Aspirin lost its trademark as part of Germany's war reparations after WW1.
Last I checked, Commodore was a company that went bankrupt and as cool as the Amiga was, doesn't nearly come into the same level of ubiquity as Apirin and it's derivatives.
Also, the USA, whilst it may have lost Vietnam, has never been pulverised into submission on its own turf AFAIK.
I told him to wind his neck in because the very thing he was having a pop at me over had been answered in a post specifically replying to him. He may have missed it, but as it was he looked a little silly responding to something said that was unrelated to him.
As for you: pot, kettle, black.
Apple have form for spanking small companies that commit acts of copyright infringement against them. As do most large multinationals. Watch Slashdot for any length of time and you'll see any number of stories under about big companies going after smaller ones that have taken liberties with their IP.
They'll ignore him now most likely, but the moment they see him turn a half decent profit using their IP, he is royally boned.
I'm sorry, I'm still waiting for your backing up of your baseless ad hom against everyone here who disagreed with you on the previous threads about being hypocrites.
Aspirin is still trademarked in many countries, Germany was not the point.
In your opinion I may look silly, but since your terse comments rarely reference who your answering let alone actually make a point I'm not worried about who is looking silly and I'm not asking your permission to respond.
As far as Apple's tendency toward litigious behavior, Apple sues anyone regardless of whether their claims are valid or not. How else could you explain the lawsuits against the Beatles' record label (which existed long before Apple computers).
What the hell does the US' actions in Vietnam have to do with anything? And, no, we weren't pulverized in a war on our own turf (unlike Germany in WWII, which by the way they so seriously deserved).
Your argument is vitriolic, but you fail to make clear, valid, points.
Instead of stating your opinions, why don't you back up those statements with rational logic?