@Dietmar:
Yes, of course, that's the challenge of an editor: do as much as possible in as little time as you can. But as I understood the original statement is that it was claimed---or at least hinted at---that the efficiency of the OS (functions) was the root cause for GoldED's speed. While in fact it is simply the 600 MHz of computing power, as you so clearly explained. I must say that what you wrote down surprised me: a 600 MHz CPU not yet fast enough for an editor...? Wow. You did a helluva job on the original then, which ran very well on my A4000. Then again, I suspect the program has evolved considerably since I last used it.