Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Good news! Nuclear bombs do not exist!  (Read 4663 times)


0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Im>bETopic starter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: May 2003
  • Posts: 315
    • Show only replies by Im>bE
    • http://www.youtube.com/user/TotalChaosTheGame
Good news! Nuclear bombs do not exist!
« on: January 18, 2015, 10:11:35 PM »
Good news! Nuclear bombs do not work. Which means nuclear bombs dont exist, which means there will be no nuclear war.



I would spread far and wide if I were you since it is not cool to scare people like this, but ofcourse it benefits those in power, so they dont care whether they would know its a hoax or not.
Hopelessly addicted to the world\'s best strategy game.
Total Chaos on YouTube

Offline danbeaver

  • Lifetime Member
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2012
  • Posts: 2467
    • Show only replies by danbeaver
Re: Good news! Nuclear bombs do not exist!
« Reply #1 on: February 01, 2015, 10:28:59 PM »
Bad News!  They are wrong.

Offline psxphill

Re: Good news! Nuclear bombs do not exist!
« Reply #2 on: July 25, 2015, 10:47:42 AM »
"Hiroshima and Nagasaki were not destroyed by atomic bombs 1945. The Japanese towns with their poor inhabitants in their simple wood/paper shanty houses were destroyed and burnt down by US napalm carpet bombings. The rich Japanese lived in the suburbs! "

There is no evidence of this napalm carpet bombing

"There is no evidence that mechanical compression of two pieces of pure Uranium or plutonium metal assisted by a mysterious 'initiator' will suddenly start a fission chain reaction that cannot be controlled."

The evidence is the atomic bombs dropped in 1945. Japan has no reason to lie about the health impact of radiation.

[SIZE=+1]"Professor Alex Wellerstein disagrees with above in an email to me 4 February 2015 and suggests:[/SIZE]    "The Hiroshima/Nagasaki damages are in fact (sic) not typical of napalm damages. They are phenomenologically distinct. There are evidences of high pressure and high thermal flux, to say nothing of induced radioactivity from neutrons, at the atomic bombing sites. Napalm does not produce these kinds of effects. The similarities between the two are mostly superficial -- firestorm, for example. But they have drastically different mortality rates (Hiroshima/Nagasaki were 2-4X more deadly per square mile than the Tokyo bombing, and the Tokyo bombing was itself considerably more deadly than any later firebombing, much less firebombings on cities of the size and makeup of Hiroshima and Nagasaki)." [SIZE=+1]But Wellerstein is probably born around 1980, i.e. 35 years after the events and influenced or brain washed by US propaganda."[/SIZE]

Being alive in 1945 is irrelevant to whether it's a hoax or not, in fact being born before 1945 means you have been exposed to more propaganda not less. You are also likely to be less educated the earlier you were born, because science advances and you rely on what you are taught.

The only proof offered for a cover up is brainwashing, the proof of the brainwashing is the cover up. It's circular reasoning and while it's possible that there is a conspiracy, this doesn't pull back the curtain and reveal the wizard.

The bombs dropped in Japan were pretty low powered.
 "There is no scientific, peer reviewed evidence that it can happen. All is military, national security top secret."
 Thankfully, I hope he isn't suggesting that civilian scientists should be allowed to perform tests. He probably realises they can't be allowed to and uses it to prop up his straw man.
« Last Edit: July 25, 2015, 11:04:56 AM by psxphill »

Offline Karlos

  • Sockologist
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 16866
  • Country: gb
  • Thanked: 4 times
    • Show only replies by Karlos
Re: Good news! Nuclear bombs do not exist!
« Reply #3 on: July 25, 2015, 11:33:27 AM »
It's not often you can have a good laugh about nuclear weapons, but this is one of those times.

Nuclear weapons most assuredly do exist, have been detonated many times in the open before test ban treatise came in to effect and the effects witnessed by many people, civilian as well as military.

How does this guy explain, for example, the tsar  bomba detonation? Really big pile of TNT?
int p; // A

Offline gertsy

  • Lifetime Member
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2006
  • Posts: 2317
  • Country: au
    • Show only replies by gertsy
    • http://www.members.optusnet.com.au/~gbakker64/
Re: Good news! Nuclear bombs do not exist!
« Reply #5 on: August 14, 2015, 09:16:51 AM »
Yeah usually just ignore conspiracy/proof topics but this one is probably correct in it's naivety.  The atomic bomb went the way of the dodo decades ago. Missiles are the delivery mechanism now.