While I have no problems with people being pro or anti C-USA or anything else, I wish people involved with C-USA would, in the interest of full disclosure: state they have vested interests. Opinions from people with vested interests on controversial topics like this are obviously biased - just like they were when that CTO Leo guy was pounding the pulpit for "the cause".
Nothing personal Dammy, but you're a moderator over there on C-USA forums. That no doubt has some bearing on the things you say that some people here may be reading and accepting as personal and unbiased opinion without outside influences. Vested interests are vested interests, no?
For the record, I am not an investor of C=USA nor am I an employee of C=USA. Yeah, I do moderate, for free, CAO. If you look who is who on CAO, you will see a very strong and long term supporters for AROS. I was the first company (Black Troll Technology Corporation which is now known (named changed but still FL corporation) as Nostromo Inc) to sell AROS boxes. Nostromo Inc is no longer involved with computers or sales of computers.
I was the original person to start bounties up for anything Amiga related with my TeamAROS. Prior to all that, I ran a ProCNet BBS with free UUCP (newsgroups and email) in Palm Beach County for seven years. Do I get some tid bit of information here and there, yes, but then again so does a moderator on AO.
I wouldn't expect a Ford salesman to try and sell me, or say a kind word - about a Chev product, but I'd expect the Ford salesman to admit he's a salesman for Ford, lol.
Well I got some news for you then, I have no vested interest in C=USA. Happy now? So exactly which Amigalike computers/OSs do you currently have? In the name of full disclosure of course so we know who you are supporting.
