Michael Jackson is NOT GUILTY

[glockspeel]

BBC News - Jackson Cleared of Abuse

 :-o

[Karlos]

I'm sure plenty of people will call the verdict into question and an equal number will counter argue. Either way, the guy's pretty badly damaged.

I wonder if we'll ever know the absolute truth of the entire situation - if you ask me, the parents of these kids willingly exposed their children to risk, considering previous allegations).

[PMC]

Just because the guy is decidedly odd doesn't mean he's a paedophile.  

[bloodline]

PMC wrote:
Just because the guy is decidedly odd doesn't mean he's a paedophile.  

You're talking Nonce Sense!

[CU_AMiGA]

bloodline wrote:

PMC wrote:
Just because the guy is decidedly odd doesn't mean he's a paedophile.  

You're talking Nonce Sense!

Hey Yo!

The first time this was brought to court, i had my doubts. But after the 20-odd time, i am not so convinced.

Regards,

Michael Jackson, not guilty by reason of celebrity.

Nothing else needs be said.

[Karlos]

@Wayne

Aye aye, I'm inclined to agree here.

It does raise an interesting question though. Do we, in general I mean, prejudge celebrities whenever they are accused of anything?

Do we, in general I mean, prejudge celebrities whenever they are accused of anything?

People "pre-judge" everything, including me and this Web site, not just celebrities.  The media doesn't help.

Wayne wrote:
Michael Jackson, not guilty by reason of celebrity.

Nothing else needs be said.

Celebrity paedo's always get away with it.

[x56h34]

People "pre-judge" everything, including me and this Web site, not just celebrities. The media doesn't help.

I think that makes you a celebritiy as well, sort of. :-)

PMC wrote:
Just because the guy is decidedly odd doesn't mean he's a paedophile.  

Sleeping with children is not "decidedly odd", it's perverted.

[cecilia]

got an email from a friend in LA:

----
seen this morning on the LA Daily newspaper (particularly for the double-entendre)- all caps, big and bold:


"HE BEAT IT"
----




:roflmao:

[Turambar]

Sleeping with children is not "decidedly odd", it's perverted

Only if he was doing it for sexual gratification.

Turambar wrote:

Sleeping with children is not "decidedly odd", it's perverted

Only if he was doing it for sexual gratification.

No.

Sleeping with a child that isn't your own is perverted full stop.

There is *no* need for it.

[Turambar]

In that case i better make sure i dont sleep in the same bed as any blokes because then ill be a homosexual?

Are you seeing the flaw in your logic here? Whether there was a need for it or not and whether you agree with it or not does not make the man a pervert.