Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: XBox 360 vs. PS3  (Read 3234 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline MskoDestny

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2004
  • Posts: 363
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.retrodev.com
Re: XBox 360 vs. PS3
« on: October 17, 2007, 06:56:32 PM »
Hardware wise, the two are probably pretty evenly matched. In theory, the PS3 has a more powerful CPU, but taking advantage of the extra power in the context of a game seems to be challenging. The 360 has a more modern GPU design (unified shader architecture), but seems to be similar in terms of raw power to the one in the PS3. The memory structure on the 360 is a bit more developer friendly.

So far the storage difference doesn't seem to have been a huge deal. There are quite a few games on the PS3 that are bigger than the 8 or 9 GB that will fit on a single DVD, but it's unclear how much of that is out of necessity and how much out of using less compression. So far the only games that have spanned multiple discs on the 360 had excessive amounts of pre-rendered video (something that has gotten less common now that in-engine cut scenes no longer look like crap).

Cross-platform games tend to look about the same graphically so far, but at the moment the 360 has a much better selection of good games than the PS3. Unless Sony pulls off a miracle this Christmas, I expect this trend will continue.

As far as value for your dollar is concerned, it largely depends on what's valuable to you. If you're primary interested in a gaming machine, it's hard to beat the new bundles that are coming out (may already be out, not sure) for the holiday season. There's the Arcade Bundle at $280 (only $30 more than the Wii) which comes with a 256MB memory card and 5 Live Arcade games (smaller games normally sold through the XBox Live Marketplace for $5-$15), though there seems to be some confusion as to whether or not these are full versions or demos. Then there's the Pro which comes with a 20GB HD, Forza 2 and Marvel Ultimate Alliance for $350.

The $400 PS3 is finally within striking distance of the 360 Premium/Pro. The complete lack of PS2 compatability is definately a minus for the sytem, but if you want a Blu-Ray player it's a good deal assuming there are games you want for the PS3.

As far as video playback is concerned, the PS3 supports more formats, but the 360's support is less anemic than it used to be. The 360 currently supports h.264, MPEG4 (but not DivX), and WMV formats.

Reliability has been a big issue on the 360 until recently. Seems there was a design flaw which resulted in a large percentage of units overheating usually resulting in the dreaded "Red Ring of Death." It would appear that this has been fixed in newer 360s, but no one will be 100% sure until these units have been around for a while. The good news is that the warranty for RRoD issues is now 3 years and 1 year for all other issues. If your console breaks, total turn-around time from when you call tech support to getting a new console is about a month with no shipping costs passed on to you (Microsoft ships you a pre-paid shipping box to send your broken unit in).

My vote would be for the 360.

Disclaimer: I am the owner of a 360. My 360 broke under warranty and was replaced.
 

Offline MskoDestny

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2004
  • Posts: 363
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.retrodev.com
Re: XBox 360 vs. PS3
« Reply #1 on: October 17, 2007, 08:35:39 PM »
Quote

leirbag28 wrote:


Ahhh, I finally have proof that people here dont get out much.  At least here in USA.

Here in USA PS3 is killng the X-Box 360.   its no argument that the PS3 (Not because its winning) has more going for it.

You obviously haven't been paying attention to the NPD sales numbers. In the US, the 360 has had a substantial lead over the PS3 in units sold every month since the PS3 has been released and has a huge advantage in installed base both because of the larger sales while they were both on the market and the head start.

Quote
it has PS3, PS2, and PS1 games for starters.

Not the new $400 40GB version. Backwards compatability has been removed to cut costs (though the more expensive 60 and 80GB versions still have this).

Quote
I know you said   "what if it didnt have Blue Ray"  but it does!

I'm not sure exactly who you're referring to here so feel free to ignore this if it's not me, but I never said anything about "what if it didn't have blu-ray." Not everyone cares about blu-ray and if you don't, it doesn't really add much to the perceived value of the system.

Quote
and its got freakin UBUNTU Linux and Yellow Dog (Nuff Freakin said")

But the GPU can't be used from Linux.

Quote
X-Box has a Few Extra good games yes..........but there are so many more for the PS3..........

Err, like what? There are a few decent exclusives out like Heavenly Sword and Resistance, but nothing I would consider a must have. Meanwhile there are a bunch of great games that are either 360 exclusive or 360 and PC only like Gears of War, Crackdown, Dead Rising, Bioshock, Halo 3, Eternal Sonata etc.

Quote
WHen you get a PS3 and see it in action when you pop in a Digital Camera memory card and it does the slide show.........you will be hooked. Its presentation is nice

My 360 does a nice little slideshow with my digital camera too, though I can't compare the presentation between it and the PS3 since I haven't seen the PS3's slideshow capabilities.

Quote
PS3 has a brighter future than X-Box. And BlueRay is beating HD-DVD here in USA

I think I'll wait until the winner is clearer. Sales for both combined are still an insignificant drop in the bucket compared to DVD