Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Linux PowerPC Blender benchmark  (Read 9308 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline commodorejohn

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2010
  • Posts: 3165
    • Show only replies by commodorejohn
    • http://www.commodorejohn.com
Re: Linux PowerPC Blender benchmark
« Reply #44 from previous page: May 07, 2012, 05:45:08 PM »
Quote from: Linde;692036
It has two cores, thus performing much better when rendering is split into two threads (as you can see from the results), just like the new Amiga computer chipset.
There's also the matter of memory speed; the G4s (at least in Macs) only ever had up to a 167MHz non-DDR FSB. Even the slowest G5 machines have much faster front-side buses than that, so anything memory-intensive is going to see a significant boost on the G5.
Computers: Amiga 1200, DEC VAXStation 4000/60, DEC MicroPDP-11/73
Synthesizers: Roland JX-10/MT-32/D-10, Oberheim Matrix-6, Yamaha DX7/FB-01, Korg MS-20 Mini, Ensoniq Mirage/SQ-80, Sequential Circuits Prophet-600, Hohner String Performer

"\'Legacy code\' often differs from its suggested alternative by actually working and scaling." - Bjarne Stroustrup
 

Offline KimmoK

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2004
  • Posts: 319
    • Show only replies by KimmoK
Re: Linux PowerPC Blender benchmark
« Reply #45 on: May 07, 2012, 09:48:07 PM »
G5 FSB...

Was it 32in + 32out hypertransport kind of bus?
For example on 2Ghz G5 the FSB ran at 1Ghz (2x4GB/s).

While G4 can do 1.3GB/s(one direction at a time) and PA6T 32 GB/s (IIRC 16+16).
- KimmoK
// Windows will never catch us now.
// The multicolor AmigaFUTURE IS NOW !! :crazy:
 

Offline commodorejohn

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2010
  • Posts: 3165
    • Show only replies by commodorejohn
    • http://www.commodorejohn.com
Re: Linux PowerPC Blender benchmark
« Reply #46 on: May 07, 2012, 09:56:39 PM »
According to Wikipedia:
Quote
The processor has two unidirectional 32-bit double data rate (DDR) buses (one for reads, the other for writes) to the system controller chip (northbridge)  running at one quarter of the processor core speed. The buses also  carry addresses and control signals in addition to data so only a  percentage of the peak bandwidth can be realized (6.4 GB/s at 450 MHz).  As the buses are unidirectional, each direction can realize only half  the aggregate bandwidth, or 3.2 GB/s.
So not exactly optimal (why oh why is there still address/data multiplexing in this day and age!?) but a damn sight better than the G4.
Computers: Amiga 1200, DEC VAXStation 4000/60, DEC MicroPDP-11/73
Synthesizers: Roland JX-10/MT-32/D-10, Oberheim Matrix-6, Yamaha DX7/FB-01, Korg MS-20 Mini, Ensoniq Mirage/SQ-80, Sequential Circuits Prophet-600, Hohner String Performer

"\'Legacy code\' often differs from its suggested alternative by actually working and scaling." - Bjarne Stroustrup