Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: New PowerPC 970FX, 24.5 Watts at 2GHz.  (Read 3436 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline minatorTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2003
  • Posts: 592
    • Show only replies by minator
    • http://www.blachford.info
Re: New PowerPC 970FX, 24.5 Watts at 2GHz.
« Reply #14 from previous page: January 23, 2004, 10:21:34 AM »
Quote
Those are typical power usage. Intel and AMD use TDP- Therman Design Power. The absolute maximum power they can draw.


No, TDP and absolute maximum are two diferent figures, the absolute maximum is usually quite a bit (up to 30 Watts) higher and is virtually impossible to find, at least from Intel.  Absolute maximum is a theoritical figure which may be impossible to reach in any case.

They all quote some form of average figure.
 

Offline Melaure

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Join Date: Jun 2003
  • Posts: 23
    • Show only replies by Melaure
    • http://www.augfrance.com/lgdm/
Re: New PowerPC 970FX, 24.5 Watts at 2GHz.
« Reply #15 on: January 23, 2004, 11:07:24 AM »
The PowerPC is regaining its normal rank in the processors war.  Motorola era is ending and IBM make what should have been doon years ago ...

Hope the Amiga platform will benefit of this work.
Apple User Group Les Gones Du Mac
TI550 768/40+40+80+100 OSX 10.2.6 Airport-Bluetooth-GPRS & Starmax 4000G3/300 144/40+120 OS8.6 & iBook G3/300 576/40 OSX 10.2.6 & LCII-040/66 42/2 OS8.1 & SE/30 & ADSL & Olitec SX200 & T68i & Visor & TI99/4
 

Offline VidarL

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Join Date: Jan 2004
  • Posts: 4
    • Show only replies by VidarL
    • http://www.langberget.com
Re: New PowerPC 970FX, 24.5 Watts at 2GHz.
« Reply #16 on: January 23, 2004, 06:58:35 PM »
Quote
No, TDP and absolute maximum are two diferent figures, the absolute maximum is usually quite a bit (up to 30 Watts) higher and is virtually impossible to find, at least from Intel. Absolute maximum is a theoritical figure which may be impossible to reach in any case.

They all quote some form of average figure.


Sorry, but you are wrong.

Intel and AMD have a different definition of TDP IIRC, as Intel quotes the maximum power usage when using a power virus, while AMD is quoting the maximum power the CPU can theoretically consume:

Quote
Thermal Design Power (TDP) is measured under the conditions of TCASE Max, IDD Max, and VDD=VID_VDD,
and include all power dissipated on-die from VDD, VDDIO, VLDT, VTT, and VDDA.
 

Offline DanDude

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 505
    • Show only replies by DanDude
Re: New PowerPC 970FX, 24.5 Watts at 2GHz.
« Reply #17 on: January 23, 2004, 08:19:38 PM »
DAMN!!!

This IS serious news between IBM and Intel.  Now I KNOW what I want for my next 'puter!   :-D

Intel's power consumption scares me.  Now you'll need a freakin liquid-coolant system just to keep your egg-cooking platter's temp. down.  :-P
#AmIRC
mesra.dal.net or hotspeed.dal.net
irc2.beyondirc.net
 

Offline Speelgoedmannetje

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2002
  • Posts: 9656
    • Show only replies by Speelgoedmannetje
Re: New PowerPC 970FX, 24.5 Watts at 2GHz.
« Reply #18 on: January 23, 2004, 08:32:21 PM »
Is it a military grade CPU? ;-)
And the canary said: \'chirp\'
 

Offline minatorTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2003
  • Posts: 592
    • Show only replies by minator
    • http://www.blachford.info
Re: New PowerPC 970FX, 24.5 Watts at 2GHz.
« Reply #19 on: January 23, 2004, 09:20:51 PM »
Quote
Intel and AMD have a different definition of TDP IIRC, as Intel quotes the maximum power usage when using a power virus,


Not according to Intel...

Quote
Thermal Design Power, Ptdp
Maximum sustained power, across a set of realistic applications, drawn under normal operating conditions, nominal Vcc and realistic ambient (use) temperature.

Maximum Power, Pmax
Maximum power drawn under normal operating conditions, worst case (Vcc,T) corner, executing worst case (synthetic) instruction set.
 

Offline VidarL

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Join Date: Jan 2004
  • Posts: 4
    • Show only replies by VidarL
    • http://www.langberget.com
Re: New PowerPC 970FX, 24.5 Watts at 2GHz.
« Reply #20 on: January 23, 2004, 09:36:25 PM »
Quote
Thermal Design Power, Ptdp
Maximum sustained power, across a set of realistic applications, drawn under normal operating conditions, nominal Vcc and realistic ambient (use) temperature.


Ok, so they Intel determine TDP by using a number of applications instead of a power virus. The fact remains that the TDP Intel gives out is MUCH higher than average power consumption. If IBM gave out a TDP number, it would be a lot higher.

Vidar
 

Offline Valan

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 173
    • Show only replies by Valan
    • http://www.creativepixels.com.hk
Re: New PowerPC 970FX, 24.5 Watts at 2GHz.
« Reply #21 on: January 24, 2004, 04:08:04 AM »
Note: this is just an idiots suggestion.

Is the power consumption related to the clock speed?
If so then IMHO it would be good if the OS could manage this so that if the user is doing wordprocessing or accessing the www then power and clock speed are kept low but then if more speed  is needed then the power/clockrate can ramp up.

Like I said just an idiots idea


Valan :-)
 

Offline minatorTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2003
  • Posts: 592
    • Show only replies by minator
    • http://www.blachford.info
Re: New PowerPC 970FX, 24.5 Watts at 2GHz.
« Reply #22 on: January 24, 2004, 09:48:42 PM »
Quote
Is the power consumption related to the clock speed?
If so then IMHO it would be good if the OS could manage this so that if the user is doing wordprocessing or accessing the www then power and clock speed are kept low but then if more speed  is needed then the power/clockrate can ramp up.

Like I said just an idiots idea


Must be a lot of idiots working at Intel, AMD and IBM then.
They do exactly what you said...
 

Offline whabang

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 7270
    • Show only replies by whabang
Re: New PowerPC 970FX, 24.5 Watts at 2GHz.
« Reply #23 on: January 27, 2004, 11:07:32 AM »
@Valan
One word:
Speedstep

It's a good idea, however Intel's poor implementation makes the experience less worthwhile.
Never tried AMD's or IBM's versions though...
Beating the dead horse since 2002.
 

Offline yssing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2002
  • Posts: 1517
    • Show only replies by yssing
    • http://www.yssing.org
Re: New PowerPC 970FX, 24.5 Watts at 2GHz.
« Reply #24 on: January 28, 2004, 08:11:53 AM »

Why get all that excited, it's never going to get used in amigas anyway. We don't even have a new AmigaOS.


This is great news, less power consumption is really great. Can't wait till I have a superfast very slick and cool amiga laptop..