Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: PCTask vs PCx vs Emplant e586 what is the best PeeCee emulator  (Read 8537 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline paul1981

Quote from: trixster;824792
Tomb Raider in PC-Task on an 80MHz 060

https://youtu.be/QzKC0Aafnw8


I've seen this before and I was impressed. Tomb Raider native 68K would run rather well if it existed.
 

Offline paul1981

Re: PCTask vs PCx vs Emplant e586 what is the best PeeCee emulator
« Reply #1 on: April 20, 2017, 09:45:11 AM »
Quote from: nicholas;824816
Tomb Raider on a Vampire 2.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHM2i_53kHE&t=19m

It's atrociously slow.


I fast forwarded the video a bit and was then looking at Lara Croft's arse for what seemed an eternity. :laughing:
 

Offline paul1981

Re: PCTask vs PCx vs Emplant e586 what is the best PeeCee emulator
« Reply #2 on: May 08, 2017, 10:03:14 AM »
Quote from: B00tDisk;825327
Dude I don't know if you're kidding or not, I think you need to step back from the idea of a usable XP environment on a 233mhz CPU and 64mb RAM.  The lowest spec machine I would even attempt to run XP (without adding the service packs, mind you) on would be in the 500mhz range with 256mb RAM.  And even then, only to say "Okay, it boots up".  Once you start adding service packs to fix the various problems it has (like, security issues), that overhead goes way, way up.  You might run XP on those specs, but you won't run any programs in XP.


A few years ago my mate installed 'XP Black Edition' on a 32MB 200MHz Dell laptop. It booted up and ran but it obviously had a bit of a tendancy to eat into its virtual memory allowance.