Amiga.org
Coffee House => Coffee House Boards => CH / Science and Technology => Topic started by: Matt_H on January 06, 2011, 03:27:15 PM
-
From OSNews: http://www.osnews.com/story/24209/NVIDIA_Announces_ARM_CPU_for_Desktop_Server_HPC
And Microsoft is bringing Windows to ARM. This is getting weird.
-
From OSNews: http://www.osnews.com/story/24209/NVIDIA_Announces_ARM_CPU_for_Desktop_Server_HPC
And Microsoft is bringing Windows to ARM. This is getting weird.
Never underestimate the stubborn attitude of we Brits.
"If at first you don’t succeed, try and try again."
This is the sweet revenge of Acorn! :D
-
So that's why nVidia wanted the Transmeta IP!
-
From OSNews: http://www.osnews.com/story/24209/NVIDIA_Announces_ARM_CPU_for_Desktop_Server_HPC
And Microsoft is bringing Windows to ARM. This is getting weird.
Nvidia have been banging on about their tegra gear for years.
Nothing has ever come of it, virtually nothing uses it afaik and the AC100 Toshiba netbook which came out recently and was reviewed by El Reg found that the software is years away from being usable.
Even MIPS has better software support.
So as far as ARM on the desktop goes... Lol, sorry, but it won't happen. Even in the NAS and home server/STB markets ARM is being pushed out by x86, specifically Atom.
It simply doesn't have either the software or the performance.
-
The 1GHz Qualcomm in this HD2 I'm typing from wipes the floor with the almost 2GHz Atom in my wife's Acer netbook and it's several generations old now.
Nvidia have been banging on about their tegra gear for years.
Nothing has ever come of it, virtually nothing uses it afaik and the AC100 Toshiba netbook which came out recently and was reviewed by El Reg found that the software is years away from being usable.
Even MIPS has better software support.
So as far as ARM on the desktop goes... Lol, sorry, but it won't happen. Even in the NAS and home server/STB markets ARM is being pushed out by x86, specifically Atom.
It simply doesn't have either the software or the performance.
-
The 1GHz Qualcomm in this HD2 I'm typing from wipes the floor with the almost 2GHz Atom in my wife's Acer netbook and it's several generations old now.
I hope you've got some benchmarks to back that up. Because every review of the HD2 I've seen has said much the same: Good hardware let down by piss poor software. (http://gizmodo.com/5400593/htc-touch-hd2-review-a-tragedy)
Also, comparing a phone to a netbook which is doing a whole hell of a lot more, really?
-
Exactly, shit hot hardware but in this case shot hot software (Gingerbread on the internal NAND).
This runs UAE perfectly without dropping a frame and perfect audio.
The netbook can't do the same.
I hope you've got some benchmarks to back that up. Because every review of the HD2 I've seen has said much the same: Good hardware let down by piss poor software. (http://gizmodo.com/5400593/htc-touch-hd2-review-a-tragedy)
Also, comparing a phone to a netbook which is doing a whole hell of a lot more, really?
-
This runs UAE perfectly without dropping a frame and perfect audio.
Again, citation needed.
The netbook can't do the same.
Right, and what else is the netbook doing? Is it running Vista or Win7, for instance?
-
Again, citation needed.
You can see for yourself next time you come for a curry.
Right, and what else is the netbook doing? Is it running Vista or Win7, for instance?
Exactly the same as the phone is. Linux.
-
You can see for yourself next time you come for a curry.
Hmm! And is my shout iirc...
Gonna have to book some time off in the none too distant future :D
Exactly the same as the phone is. Linux.
Goodo, but what kind? Some lightweight distro like crunchbang or some full fat distro like Kubuntu?
-
Hmm! And is my shout iirc...
Gonna have to book some time off in the none too distant future :D
Goodo, but what kind? Some lightweight distro like crunchbang or some full fat distro like Kubuntu?
Debian with LXDE.
I can run Ubuntu 9.10 on the HD2 though and it's nice and snappy.
-
I can see I am going to have to root my new phone at some point as it's only half the clock speed of the HD2...
-
Debian with LXDE.
I can run Ubuntu 9.10 on the HD2 though and it's nice and snappy.
Bah, LXDE is big and bloated! I use a pure Openbox install with Guake as a terminal emulator. Only reason for having X is that I want a graphical web browser. ;)
-
Nvidia have been banging on about their tegra gear for years.
Nothing has ever come of it, virtually nothing uses it afaik and the AC100 Toshiba netbook which came out recently and was reviewed by El Reg found that the software is years away from being usable.
Even MIPS has better software support.
So as far as ARM on the desktop goes... Lol, sorry, but it won't happen. Even in the NAS and home server/STB markets ARM is being pushed out by x86, specifically Atom.
It simply doesn't have either the software or the performance.
uh, you do realise that Project Denver is not Tegra. Their new chip is nothing to do with Tegra at all.
-
uh, you do realise that Project Denver is not Tegra. Their new chip is nothing to do with Tegra at all.
And you do realise that for all of that, Tegra throughout it's entire life was used in sweet fa. Just like it's predecessor Project Denver is likely to share the same fate unfortunately. The market for these things has all but moved on.
As much as I have a soft spot for alternative cpu archs, ARM has less and less of a place outside of cellphones and embedded sectors - neither of which need something for the most part along the lines of Tegra or Denver.
Atom has all but subsumed the high performance STB/Nas/home server markets and when coupled with Nvidia's ION2 chipset makes for a remarkably potent system, especially in it's dual core variants.
-
Aye, and Via's line-up cover the places where the Atom doesn't cut it. On the other hand, nVidia might be trying to get the contract for the CPU's in the next generation gaming consoles. I can imagine they got a big hole in their wallet after everyone chose the PPC/Ati route for the current ones.
-
As much as I have a soft spot for alternative cpu archs, ARM has less and less of a place outside of cellphones and embedded sectors
I doubt ARM worries about that, though - analysts expects around 5 billion ARM cores to be shipped this year (fewer CPU's, since more and more of the designs are dual core).
While they may seem to have been pushed out of places like the desktop, keep in mind that the desktop and laptops make up a smaller and smaller percentage of the computing market.
Cellphones, tablets and embedded devices is where the volume is, and both cellphones and tablets are eating their way up into spaces where laptops and desktops ruled before. Look at the newly announced Motorola Atrix - a phone that docs with a laptop "shell", as well as a number of phones that now support bluetooth keyboards.
As a result, we might very well see the bottom falling out of the desktop and laptop market very soon, with both of them relegated to the high end of the market, with smart phones and tablets becoming the only computers for a lot of people. And that sector is overwhelmingly ARM dominated, with 90%+ of the cores shipped.
EDIT: Oh, yes, forgot to mention: The Atrix *does* use the Nvidia Tegra
-
As a result, we might very well see the bottom falling out of the desktop and laptop market very soon, with both of them relegated to the high end of the market, with smart phones and tablets becoming the only computers for a lot of people. And that sector is overwhelmingly ARM dominated, with 90%+ of the cores shipped.
Doubtful, what is being shown is that whilst traditional big box stuff isn't selling as well, all in ones, so called life style PCs are doing rather well for a variety of reasons. Maybe this will change, but I think Atom will certainly make up a large proportion of the market. It's not particularly fast, but it's fast enough for most people, especially in it's dualcore encarnation.
As for your figures about the number of cores sold, only a tiny proportion of them will be anything other than low end.
EDIT: Oh, yes, forgot to mention: The Atrix *does* use the Nvidia Tegra
Looking through El Reg, it seems a couple of the tablets being displayed at CES are going to use it, so I spoke too soon. However, Tegra has been around for what, 3 years now?
Still waiting for the software to catch up though.
-
Bah, LXDE is big and bloated! I use a pure Openbox install with Guake as a terminal emulator. Only reason for having X is that I want a graphical web browser. ;)
You are aware you are boasting over what a woman in her 30's uses on her netbook aren't you? :lol:
-
Doubtful, what is being shown is that whilst traditional big box stuff isn't selling as well, all in ones, so called life style PCs are doing rather well for a variety of reasons.
They are still being outsold massively by smartphones. Smartphones that now more an more commonly can either hook up to larger keyboards and/or TVs/monitors. It removes the need for a more complicated computers for a fairly large segment of users that only wants to download/listen to music, surf the web, check their e-mail and write the odd letter etc.
As for your figures about the number of cores sold, only a tiny proportion of them will be anything other than low end.
That's part of the point: The very low end now is so powerful that more and more people don't *need* any more. The average price for laptops sold for example has gone through the floor, and even that wasn't enough to stave off the rise of netbooks.
Still waiting for the software to catch up though.
It doesn't need to. Most users of these devices are fall in one of two categories: The ones that are light computer users only using it for a relatively small set of functions, and the ones that use it as a secondary device. Both of these are catered for by Android (or iOS or whatever floats their boat). As for the rest of the potential market? With Windows for ARM, no matter what we might think of Windows, most people will be satisfied...
Notice also how the Motorola phone also has an alternative docking station that lets you connect the phone to TV or monitor. Effectively they are targeting the rapidly growing segment that is willing to shell out far more than the average laptop price on "just a phone" but that might want the added capabilities occasionally.
If I was a desktop or laptop maker targeting the low end, I'd be very, very nervous about what's coming.
-
With Windows for ARM, no matter what we might think of Windows, most people will be satisfied...
it seems name of the game is Windows/Arm vs ChromeOS/Intel. :afro:
-
I hope you've got some benchmarks to back that up. Because every review of the HD2 I've seen has said much the same: Good hardware let down by piss poor software. (http://gizmodo.com/5400593/htc-touch-hd2-review-a-tragedy)
Also, comparing a phone to a netbook which is doing a whole hell of a lot more, really?
See attached screen shot, HD2 is the bar at the top.
http://www.abload.de/image.php?img=quadranty9dw.png
-
They are still being outsold massively by smartphones.
Ok I'm going to need a citation for that.
That's part of the point: The very low end now is so powerful that more and more people don't *need* any more. The average price for laptops sold for example has gone through the floor, and even that wasn't enough to stave off the rise of netbooks.
Erm, entry level laptop prices have been at around the £300 mark for at least the past 5 years. You can get low end laptops and desktops that is cheaper than a netbook.
As for the rise of the netbook, from what I've seen the sales of them have started to level out.
With Windows for ARM, no matter what we might think of Windows, most people will be satisfied...
Not if their favourite programs can run on them, games especially.
Notice also how the Motorola phone also has an alternative docking station that lets you connect the phone to TV or monitor. Effectively they are targeting the rapidly growing segment that is willing to shell out far more than the average laptop price on "just a phone" but that might want the added capabilities occasionally.
Seen it. I've played with such phones, the experience is less than stellar currently.
If I was a desktop or laptop maker targeting the low end, I'd be very, very nervous about what's coming.
Perhaps. But as I said, the software just isn't there yet. And yes, I'm including android in that. Maybe Android 3.0 will be the one that sorts it all. But in all honesty I'm not holding my breath.
-
Some competition in the market place will do everybody some good.
-
You are aware you are boasting over what a woman in her 30's uses on her netbook aren't you? :lol:
Well, I wouldn't be hanging around AO if I weren't a geek! :lol:
-
Ok I'm going to need a citation for that.
These are 2009 numbers, not much in terms of 2010 numbers available yet:
Smartphone sales at 172 million (http://techcrunch.com/2010/02/23/smartphone-iphone-sales-2009-gartner/) vs. global PC sales at 66 million in Q2 (http://www.electronista.com/articles/09/07/15/idc.prelim.q2.2009/), so if we extrapolate those numbers to all of 2009, which we can't be sure is reliable, we'd get 262 million, so I guess I those numbers don't back that one up...
But these look better: Q2 2010 seems to indicate 70+ million smartphones a quarter (http://www.canalys.com/pr/2010/r2010081.html)
EDIT: Doh. Updated to reflect that the PC sales numbers was for one quarter.
EDIT2: Hah, but growing at a ridiculous rate.
Erm, entry level laptop prices have been at around the £300 mark for at least the past 5 years. You can get low end laptops and desktops that is cheaper than a netbook.
Entry level, yes, but the issue is *average* laptop prices. PC manufacturers have been increasingly squeezed as everyone outside of the Mac market buy cheaper laptops than they used to on average. This is why profits from PC sales for the major PC manufacturers gets dwarfed by profits from Apples lower sales volumes (even if you exclude their iTunes, iPod and iPhone business).
Not if their favourite programs can run on them, games especially.
The average PC users don't play high end titles on their PC's. They are at most casual gamers, and more and more of that market is being taken over by phone.
Seen it. I've played with such phones, the experience is less than stellar currently.
It doesn't need to be stellar. It needs to be good enough for someone that needs to use Facebook and write a letter and run iTunes.
-
These are 2009 numbers, not much in terms of 2010 numbers available yet:
Smartphone sales at 172 million (http://techcrunch.com/2010/02/23/smartphone-iphone-sales-2009-gartner/) vs. global PC sales at 66 million (http://www.electronista.com/articles/09/07/15/idc.prelim.q2.2009/).
Ouch. More than adequate to prove your point.
Entry level, yes, but the issue is *average* laptop prices. PC manufacturers have been increasingly squeezed as everyone outside of the Mac market buy cheaper laptops than they used to on average.
One of the factors you do have to take into account is the recession, which is going to do it's own thing with regard to how many people buy higher end kit. The question will be will the averages go back up again once the economy is in a better state?
The average PC users don't play high end titles on their PC's. They are at most casual gamers, and more and more of that market is being taken over by phone.
That isn't taking into account their current investment, they might not buy high end games, but they still buy games, if they buy a new computer and suddenly all their games stop working, they're going to be hella pissed. Consider how much negative press Microsoft got due to things breaking in Vista, now apply that to 100% of their current software.
It doesn't need to be stellar.
I think I might have understated it. By "less than stellar" I mean significantly more painful to use than the Wii browser, which is pants.
-
Perhaps. But as I said, the software just isn't there yet. And yes, I'm including android in that. Maybe Android 3.0 will be the one that sorts it all. But in all honesty I'm not holding my breath.
Android 2.2/2.3 are fine and dandy for moi, but just for you Alan.... :)
http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/05/google-shows-off-android-3-0-the-entirely-for-tablet-honeycom/
-
Yeah, no major complaints with 2.2 so far and that's on a fairly entry level smartphone.
-
Yeah, no major complaints with 2.2 so far and that's on a fairly entry level smartphone.
It's total modularity is very Amiga-like and dare I say more of a successor to the Amiga philosophy than any other OS on the market today.