guru-666 wrote:
Yes Flashy, I have been following this from the start. I guess anybody that does not share your narrow minded opinion is trolling. Well I'm not, I'm sick if the assumptions you make about the law, 3.1 and piracy. Like I have told you before, softhut was putting 3.1 on there OVERPRICED HD's, (making a profit) With out selling the floppies! .. so if you really have a problem then sue them! This guy is just selling his HD and it has 3.1 on it, so what? I think you have a bad attitude and a narrow vision if the wold... look beyond the boing ball.
Then Softhut were equally wrong.
But be under absolutely no illusion, putting 3.1 (3.0 does seem to be a grey area given it's distribution on coverCDs from CU, AmigActive and Amiga Format) is piracy, unless it comes with a set of the original media to go with it.
guru-666 wrote:
You are the person that should go delete 3.1 from your hard drive because after all, who really owns it... and it's just not moral for you to use it.
Provided he has a set of the original media, he is fully entitled to purchase and use that hard drive. Morals have nothing to do with it, only the law.
guru-666 wrote:
YOu are from Holland, you guys pirate software and movies at a similar rate to china....now you dare to speak of somebody selling a HD with OS3.1 on it..... WOW
Hmm, how many ways is this wrong... Potentially racist, definitely against the TOS not to mention an utterly strawman argument.
guru-666 wrote:
guys gues what, if you seel bad about it, don't buy it!
...
guru-666 wrote:
IF ANYBODY HAS THE RIGHT TO COMPLAIN ABOUT THIS AUCTION IT IS WHO EVER OWNS OS3.1, THEY DID NOT ASK FOR YOU HELP. THEY DID NOT SUE SOFTHUT AND DI NOT REPORT THIS TO EBAY... GET THE POINT...
In some countries, not reporting a crime in progress can get you in trouble on the basis of aiding and abetting. Admittedly in this case it's hardly of interest to anyone to prosecute, it still doesn't make it legal to do. Your point, like most of your posts in this thread as far as I can tell is somewhat hard to distinguish due to all the personal attacks tied into them...
To carvedeye, yes, you were in the wrong, not only for including 3.1 on the drive sans original install media, but for also flogging it as a 1200 drive for reasons given previously, but to be honest, I suspect that no one is seriously going to lose sleep over this. I doubt beyond anything other then a point of discussion, anyone genuinely gives a crap at a single old hard drive with a fresh install of 3.1. being flogged on ebay.