Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: PFS3 status update  (Read 8965 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline SHADES

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Apr 2002
  • Posts: 355
  • Country: au
    • Show all replies
Re: PFS3 status update
« on: April 21, 2011, 11:23:57 AM »
you've got to be kidding? the Perfect File System 3 code? you ported it?
i tried many many times to contact the author to get this released to public over many many years!!
i thought it was closed source, i.e. proprietary, paid for software.
i always used this file system, was so much faster and more reliable than ffs, tests i have done show it to be faster than sfs too.

Err, i'd love to see this file system back in development if you did manage to contact the author and get the code!
All i can say is wow. well done!
« Last Edit: April 21, 2011, 11:27:38 AM by SHADES »
It's not the question, that is the problem, it is the problem, that is the question.
 

Offline SHADES

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Apr 2002
  • Posts: 355
  • Country: au
    • Show all replies
Re: PFS3 status update
« Reply #1 on: November 06, 2011, 12:35:35 PM »
just wondering if there has been any progress made with partition sizes, AROS intergration etc. There is very little to be found on sourceforge
It's not the question, that is the problem, it is the problem, that is the question.
 

Offline SHADES

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Apr 2002
  • Posts: 355
  • Country: au
    • Show all replies
Re: PFS3 status update
« Reply #2 on: April 14, 2013, 12:30:19 AM »
Is there a donate section for thos roject at all, I tried the links however, I could not get them to work :(
I really hope this hasn't stalled
It's not the question, that is the problem, it is the problem, that is the question.
 

Offline SHADES

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Apr 2002
  • Posts: 355
  • Country: au
    • Show all replies
Re: PFS3 status update
« Reply #3 on: April 16, 2013, 04:26:37 AM »
So any news on larger disk partitions? Perhaps people are too busy working on it for a change log :-p
I'll just be happy it's still being developed although I'd be happy to donate for it.
It's not the question, that is the problem, it is the problem, that is the question.