@zylesea
I didn't say one thing about software. This thread was/is about MorphOS and why it won't be ported to x86 anytime soon, if ever.
My comments were in no way a comparison of MorphOS, Windows NT or OS X. I was pointing out that endian-ness is not a problem when porting ANY operating system to different hardware architectures. If it was a problem, we wouldn't see Linux running on nearly every processor that's been developed. I'm tired of arm-chair experts who constantly sound like parrots and repeat the same old garbage that endian-ness is what is keeping MorphOS from being ported to x86. If it's such a problem, then how did the AROS team port it to PPC? If it's such a problem, how did Microsoft port NT to the PPC? If it's such a problem, how did Apple port OSX to x86? OS porting across architectures happens all the time! And of course it means the applications need to be recompiled for the target OS unless you use something like Rosetta or Wine or DOSBox. Nobody is/was arguing this point, but for some reason you seem to be trolling for a fight.
And yes, the operating systems that I mentioned are all diverse and quite different, but of the ones I mentioned, OSX is quite similar to MorphOS and to OS4, at least on the surface. Endian-ness will never be the reason why an OS is or isn't ported. It's all about demand and the return on investment for the developer!