IE 9 is not bad. It loads fast, is nicely integrated in the best multitasking operating system in the world: Win 7.
You say it is bloated? Are you serious?! LOL someone bought the FF hype.
It is evil?! LOL, spinning the age old myth that MS is evil. I would bet IE is less evil than MorphOS is.
There are a multitude of things wrong with this post, itself is riddled in fallacy.
Lets compare release cycles shall we?
IE: About 2 to 2 1/2 years
Chrome: one to two months
Firefox: ditto
Then there is your quote "best multitasking operating system in the world: Win 7."
Windows XP was the last (out of 3) versions of Windows I have genuinely paid for. XP is a very good OS, but it is definitely showing age. 7 improved much over Vista, but I have some complaints: Taskbar is ripped off of OS X. "Snapping" and other features are product gimmicks that they over do. Windows has a longer release cycle than either Ubuntu or OS X, even counting service packs and major hotfixes. It is also the only one of the three to have product activation/genuine advantage bull****.
All NT based versions of windows have certain bottlenecks to performance, such as swap based ONLY as a file and no option to have a partition, like UNIX derivatives. Other examples include having the GUI in supervisor mode, NTFS being a wasteful FS (Ext2-4, HFS+, FAT32/EXFAT, HAMMER and ZFS are all excellent choices) the fact that it still uses a COMMAND.COM style shell, caps on TCP connections and the fact that NT is a bloated kernel despite it not being Monolithic (98SE has a vastly superior kernel in many respects and is a good DOS gaming OS).