@Downix
I was under the impression you ran Pegasos-USA and resold Genesi kit in the USA? If this is wrong please correct me and Ill apologise for the misunderstanding.
Heres the bit thats important:
All while their executives laugh to the bank, having embezzled
the investors money
If that was the case then accusations on a public forum could be seen in the light of impending or in progress legal action taken in the US against Amiga Inc. It has more weight if you see what I mean.
If as a private citizen, then its not the Genesi position and it has less weight.
I too have the impression that you do about Fleecy in particular which is why I put the question I did on AmigaWorld - which you will have notice DIDNT get selected this week.
I put a question this week about what he thinks the value of the brand is now in dollars. ;-)
@Dammy
I understand your position, but what you need to realise is that in this world ( Amiga ) Im just another consumer. Like you. I don't have "red troll" blinkers on as the dialogue we had on the ANN thread should have told you ( and the questions on AmigaWorld ).
I have respect for the work of Hyperion and Eyetech ( to a lesser extent ) but that respect does *not* extend to any other parties in this market unless they have earned it.
:-?
I realise that you think that just because I don't agree with you often on public forums this must mean Im some kind of hood with an interest. It really is not the case.
The only interest I have is OS4, and further on from that the truth. The questions I ask are often aimed at those that make bland statements without substantiation and I cannot see how they get from the known facts to their assertions so I put questions in the way ( and yes I often deliberately phrase it in such a way so they should see how their assertion sounds to other ears ). I think this is what you think is trolling.
I have to do this far less for those that make strange assertions that are positive about Amiga Inc because of the cacophony of those arguing in that direction.
Just because say Seehund sayes something ( that is his reasoned conclusion ) for example ( just an example Seehund ) does not mean that I have to take it and his reasoning as verbatim truth - there may be simplifications and there is his background to consider as well as what we know from current knowledge about what really transpired in the past ( good example: AOS4 when it was being *not* developed by H+P and On Schedule and Rockin` ).
Oh I don't know why Im explaining. :-?
