Actually, I play more games than you. I have 5 different machines from 1980s to present for playing games. I don't care about benchmarks of the CPU-- I only care about how good the game is, the controls, the collision detection, and the smoothness and wait time. You're just getting too emotionally involved because of your attachment to PCs and can't see the clear cut argument.
You mayyyy want to rethink that remark there chief. You are again stepping foot on ignorant soil.
Unless you wanna come over and play:
MSX, CoCo 3, C64, 286, 486, new stuff, or basically any console released between pong and now. I'm talkin intellivision, coleco, astrocade, and all the other fun stuff.
I'm a gamer. That's what I do. I play more than you'll ever know. Bet me.
Also benchmarks matter if you want optimal performance with your new 3D intense games. If you don't understand that, you aren't a gamer.
As I said, the argument has no basis to decide the machine for someone. Most people nowadays are addicted to and involved with internet so that's a reason to use modern PCs. NASA is using a mix of various PCs-- it's no clear cut that they use a standard PC-- you are going by your limited one-sided experience. Nor does their research warrant someone else imitating them.
It's not one sided. I sure didn't see any Amiga's in action. Find me a NASA project running on Amiga, and also, you dodged the "when were you there last" question. Probably because you weren't there recently, or may not have even been to the one where I am from.
In your emotional irrational frenzy to reply, you misread my statement. Go back and re-read what I wrote.
what statement, I was too busy laughing at you and playing games.
You have any reason to tell me I should stop using Amigas for gaming and multimedia?
1) You can't play new stuff on the Amiga, and homebrew is lacking
2) If you think an Amiga trumps any modern multimedia experience, you're even stupider than I thought.
You got bluray and surround sound coming out of your Amiga?
