Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: X2000 or sue ... your comments  (Read 12277 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline utri007

Re: X2000 or sue ... your comments
« Reply #29 on: December 24, 2013, 10:58:36 AM »
Quote from: WolfToTheMoon;755160
Vox, that Powermac G5 with MorphOS 3.2 is still for sale, asking 150 Euros.

http://www.njuskalo.hr/macintosh/powermac-g5-2.0ghz-dualcore-oglas-8614473


Amiga.org has quite few Amiga OS4 users, because historical reasons.
ACube Sam 440ep Flex 800mhz, 1gb ram and 240gb hd and OS4.1FE
A1200 Micronic tower, OS3.9, Apollo 060 66mhz, xPert Merlin, Delfina Lite and Micronic Scandy, 500Gb hd, 66mb ram, DVD-burner and WLAN.
A1200 desktop, OS3.9, Blizzard 060 66mhz, 66mb ram, Ide Fix Express with 160Gb HD and WLAN
A500 OS2.1, GVP+HD8 with 4mb ram, 1mb chip ram and 4gb HD
Commodore CDTV KS3.1, 1mb chip, 4mb fast ram and IDE HD
 

Offline Iggy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 5348
    • Show only replies by Iggy
Re: X2000 or sue ... your comments
« Reply #30 on: December 24, 2013, 11:03:26 AM »
Quote from: WolfToTheMoon;755160
Vox, that Powermac G5 with MorphOS 3.2 is still for sale, asking 150 Euros.

http://www.njuskalo.hr/macintosh/powermac-g5-2.0ghz-dualcore-oglas-8614473


Nice price.
With or without an OS key?

Funny, this whole discussion of the merits of one option vs the other parallels a long discussion I had with David Morris.
And while I now own a G5, I would still consider an X2000 or a SAM460 (at least if MorphOS were an option).
"Not making any hard and fast rules means that the moderators can use their good judgment in moderation, and we think the results speak for themselves." - Amiga.org, terms of service

"You, got to stem the evil tide, and keep it on the the inside" - Rogers Waters

"God was never on your side" - Lemmy

Amiga! "Our appeal has become more selective"
 

Offline WolfToTheMoon

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 408
    • Show only replies by WolfToTheMoon
Re: X2000 or sue ... your comments
« Reply #31 on: December 24, 2013, 11:20:05 AM »
Quote from: Iggy;755163
Nice price.
With or without an OS key?


I would have to call to confirm either way, but probably without the key... still, pretty good price compared to what he paid for X1000 and got in return.
 

Offline Megamig

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 123
    • Show only replies by Megamig
Re: X2000 or sue ... your comments
« Reply #32 on: December 24, 2013, 11:24:39 AM »
This is turning into another X1000 bashing...

To a degree people do have the right to be annoyed. The X1000 is not marketed as the beta X1000 computer.

As for driver support, it is a insult to all X1000 customers that there is talk of the X2000 when the X1000 is still a work in progress.
Too many A500s
2x A1200 (3.1 DKB Cobra inc. Ferret)
A2000 HD
 

Offline nicholas

Re: X2000 or sue ... your comments
« Reply #33 on: December 24, 2013, 11:30:41 AM »
Quote from: Iggy;755163
Nice price.
With or without an OS key?

Funny, this whole discussion of the merits of one option vs the other parallels a long discussion I had with David Morris.
And while I now own a G5, I would still consider an X2000 or a SAM460 (at least if MorphOS were an option).

I can't remember, but does the CPU variety in the X2000 series of boards have Altivec?

If so and it was possible to buy one without the Hyperion tax and
MorphOS was ported to it then I'd consider one myself if the price was right.

ARIX support would seal the deal. :)
“Een rezhim-i eshghalgar-i Quds bayad az sahneh-i ruzgar mahv shaved.” - Imam Ayatollah Sayyed  Ruhollah Khomeini
 

Offline WolfToTheMoon

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 408
    • Show only replies by WolfToTheMoon
Re: X2000 or sue ... your comments
« Reply #34 on: December 24, 2013, 11:34:12 AM »
Quote from: nicholas;755169
I can't remember, but does the CPU variety in the X2000 series of boards have Altivec?

If so and it was possible to buy one without the Hyperion tax and
MorphOS was ported to it then I'd consider one myself if the price was right.

ARIX support would seal the deal. :)


There is no Altivec in either P3041 or P5020/5040 chips...
 

Offline Iggy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 5348
    • Show only replies by Iggy
Re: X2000 or sue ... your comments
« Reply #35 on: December 24, 2013, 11:35:29 AM »
Quote from: Megamig;755168
This is turning into another X1000 bashing...

To a degree people do have the right to be annoyed. The X1000 is not marketed as the beta X1000 computer.

As for driver support, it is a insult to all X1000 customers that there is talk of the X2000 when the X1000 is still a work in progress.


That last comment seems rather bizarre.
Frankly, rather than an insult, I'd consider it a sign of success.
And at least I could never be considered one to bash this platform.
Certainly the rate at which Hyperion develops drivers is pathetic, but that is not A-eon's fault.
Trevor has even give cash to Hyperion's contracted developers for 3Ddriver development (which still has not produced results).

Rather than consider bashing A-eon and its well designed product, I would just like to take the moment to point out how much more successful this might be with the right OS.

And that OS does not carry the Amiga name.

That legacy does seem cursed, as all legitimate development after Amiga has received less support than would seem appropriate.
"Not making any hard and fast rules means that the moderators can use their good judgment in moderation, and we think the results speak for themselves." - Amiga.org, terms of service

"You, got to stem the evil tide, and keep it on the the inside" - Rogers Waters

"God was never on your side" - Lemmy

Amiga! "Our appeal has become more selective"
 

Offline WolfToTheMoon

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 408
    • Show only replies by WolfToTheMoon
Re: X2000 or sue ... your comments
« Reply #36 on: December 24, 2013, 11:40:16 AM »
What I find somewhat bizarre and funny is that VOX is so unhappy with the alpha/beta status of X1000 software, that he wants to sue... yet, he doesn't seem to mind going thru all that beta-testing chaos again with Cyrus :D
 

Offline nicholas

Re: X2000 or sue ... your comments
« Reply #37 on: December 24, 2013, 11:40:39 AM »
Quote from: WolfToTheMoon;755170
There is no Altivec in either P3041 or P5020/5040 chips...

Thanks, that means it's off my Xmas list then.

No Altivec in this day and age is ridiculous.
“Een rezhim-i eshghalgar-i Quds bayad az sahneh-i ruzgar mahv shaved.” - Imam Ayatollah Sayyed  Ruhollah Khomeini
 

Offline yssing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2002
  • Posts: 1517
    • Show only replies by yssing
    • http://www.yssing.org
Re: X2000 or sue ... your comments
« Reply #38 on: December 24, 2013, 11:43:12 AM »
@Nicholas AFAIK there is not that many programs that support the altivec.
 

Offline Iggy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 5348
    • Show only replies by Iggy
Re: X2000 or sue ... your comments
« Reply #39 on: December 24, 2013, 12:03:57 PM »
Quote from: nicholas;755173
Thanks, that means it's off my Xmas list then.

No Altivec in this day and age is ridiculous.

Freescale has announced that an improved set of AltiVec instructions will be reintroduced to later revisions of the e5500 core (as well as other Qorlq products).
That being said, Trevor has decided to move forward before these products are introduced.
While I disagree that they are not commonly used (MorphOS will use them when present), their abscence is not a game changer for me.
The processors in question still have a good floating point unit.
And later revisions of these processors should be compatible with Trevor's new designs.
You have to remember that the processors used in Acube's boards don't support AltiVec either and can still run operating systems like MorphOS (which still have specific requirements for the math processing unit).
Frankly, I would have prefered an e6500 cored processor, but the rev. 2 silicon for that will not be available until this fall and will then top out at 1.8 GHz (as opposed to the 2.2 GHz Trevor is aimming for).
"Not making any hard and fast rules means that the moderators can use their good judgment in moderation, and we think the results speak for themselves." - Amiga.org, terms of service

"You, got to stem the evil tide, and keep it on the the inside" - Rogers Waters

"God was never on your side" - Lemmy

Amiga! "Our appeal has become more selective"
 

Offline nicholas

Re: X2000 or sue ... your comments
« Reply #40 on: December 24, 2013, 12:10:17 PM »
Quote from: yssing;755176
@Nicholas AFAIK there is not that many programs that support the altivec.

On MorphOS Altivec is  
automatically used if present, programs don't have to explicitly use it.

AFAIK anyway.
“Een rezhim-i eshghalgar-i Quds bayad az sahneh-i ruzgar mahv shaved.” - Imam Ayatollah Sayyed  Ruhollah Khomeini
 

Offline nicholas

Re: X2000 or sue ... your comments
« Reply #41 on: December 24, 2013, 12:12:03 PM »
@Jim,

If the newer CPUs are at some point used in the future that would make the X2000 more desirable.
“Een rezhim-i eshghalgar-i Quds bayad az sahneh-i ruzgar mahv shaved.” - Imam Ayatollah Sayyed  Ruhollah Khomeini
 

Offline WolfToTheMoon

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 408
    • Show only replies by WolfToTheMoon
Re: X2000 or sue ... your comments
« Reply #42 on: December 24, 2013, 12:19:58 PM »
Quote from: nicholas;755181
@Jim,

If the newer CPUs are at some point used in the future that would make the X2000 more desirable.

Yeah, IF they weren't soldering CPUs on the board... so you can't replace them easily.
 

Offline yssing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2002
  • Posts: 1517
    • Show only replies by yssing
    • http://www.yssing.org
Re: X2000 or sue ... your comments
« Reply #43 on: December 24, 2013, 12:27:14 PM »
@Nicolas, is MorphOS going to be available on the x1000 and x2000?

If not, then does it matter that mos can use the altivec.
 

Offline spirantho

Re: X2000 or sue ... your comments
« Reply #44 from previous page: December 24, 2013, 12:31:08 PM »
Programs need to be compiled for Altivec whatever the OS. It's different code to non-Altivec. The only exception is where Altivec is used in shared libraries, but that's rare.
--
Ian Gledhill
ian.gledhill@btinternit.com (except it should be internEt of course...!)
Check out my shop! http://www.mutant-caterpillar.co.uk/shop/ - for 8-bit (and soon 16-bit) goodness!