New Amiga Accelerators

[bloodline]

delshay wrote:
@bloodline

you posted a comment in one of my photo album i don't think it's funny but you must think a little bit more before posting :-D

Hahah yeah :-)

[aperez]

I hardly find the comparison fitting, however IMHO any genuinely talented systems administrator has a genuinely rich knowledge of underlying hardware design (CPU architecture, memory subsystem limitations, etc) and in my case, I work with engineering staff on a daily basis to aid them in addressing these sorts of issues.

@Bloodline: You have my sincerest apologies. I believe I misattributed several posts from another user who shall remain nameless as your own, much to my dismay. Additionally, in my late-night reading of several different threads, I believe I mistook some comments of yours from other threads and unwittingly confused them as being replies to this thread. I re-read the entire thread, and besides your first reply, I don't really see anything in this particular thread that is at all objectionable.

[shoggoth]

aperez wrote:
I hardly find the comparison fitting, however IMHO any genuinely talented systems administrator has a genuinely rich knowledge of underlying hardware design (CPU architecture, memory subsystem limitations, etc) and in my case, I work with engineering staff on a daily basis to aid them in addressing these sorts of issues.

Dude. These are your first posts in this forum. Think again. People here are generally not retards.

You could either gain respect by stating your case using hard facts *or* give people the impression that you're an ignorant dick by using the "I'm right because I'm a systems administrator with rich knowledge"-approach.

(and frankly, "systems administrator with a genuinely rich knowledge" != "hardware engineer").

[Boudicca]

"any genuinely talented systems administrator"

Met loads of those......

"has a genuinely rich knowledge"

Yep and met one or two of those

with "underlying hardware design (CPU architecture, memory subsystem limitations"

Hardly any of those....!

IMHO....it takes a ikle bit more than being Sys Adm to understand hardware to that level.

Sys Adm gives you good overall but not the fine detail to understand at the level we are talking here.

I've been a Sys Adm for 9 years, a developer for 10 years before that and I began as an electronics tech in the 6502/z80 era....the stuff they do today is way beyond my patience and understanding.

I certainly can hold my own at the x86 architecture level but I would never claim I could component level design/build or repair one.

To much for my brain to hold onto without leaking.

[aperez]

@shoggoth: "(and frankly, "systems administrator with a genuinely rich knowledge" != "hardware engineer")."

I never claimed it did...

[the_leander]

I notice you've not offered a single shred of evidence to your assertion of Bloodlines alledged innacuracies.

You're repeated "I'm a systems administrator" cuts about as much mustard here as it would if I were to start spouting off about building linux based pbx's for {bleep}s and giggles (which I did, a couple of times, which was fun).

IE, none. It's not relevant to the conversation.

So. Your money where your mouth is, show us where bloodline has messed up.