bd1308 wrote:
as laughable as the above comments are, this one really stuck out. Why would MS of all people put some arbitrary limit on memory?
:lol:
To quote Bill Gates, "Nobody one will ever need more than 640K of ram." Ever, no how, no way - 640K of ram is just WAY too much ram for the average person. We'll be running 640K of ram for the next 50 years.
Well I might have added the last part. :lol:
Sorry just kidding around because actually your statement is 100%, even back with 640K+384K it was a limit of the 20-bit address of the processor.
"I laid out memory so the bottom 640K was general purpose RAM and the upper 384 I reserved for video and ROM, and things like that. That is why they talk about the 640K limit. It is actually a limit, not of the software, in any way, shape, or form, it is the limit of the microprocessor. That thing generates addresses, 20-bits addresses, that only can address a megabyte of memory. And, therefore, all the applications are tied to that limit. It was ten times what we had before.
But to my surprise, we ran out of that address base for applications within—oh five or six years people were complaining."
* Smithsonian Institution interview (1993)
Bill was still surprised that anyone would need more so quickly. Techno-genius that he is. :roll: