>by shoggoth on 2009/1/28 7:51:38
Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
amigaksi wrote:
>by shoggoth on 2009/1/27 6:39:12
>>You are being vague. I have stuck to my position for many years now although in the process HPET got introduced and Vista came out.
>No. I entered this discussion because:
>A: You make claims about how emulators work.
>B: Those claims are completely wrong.
You haven't shown any of my claims to be wrong. You just have a different definition of cycle-accuracy and emulation. All of my statements are proven.
>I've got a question for you, Amigaski:
>A: You know how emulators work internally, and therefore your statements about emulators are true.
>B: You don't know how emulators work internally, but you do know for a fact that your statements are true anyway.
>Which one is it, Amigaski? A or B?
>>I already answered this. It's C-- I know how the PC works and Amiga works so I know whether some Amiga function can be emulated on the PC. It's called deductive logic-- not straw man argument or insult like you use. Here's a simpler example, I know for a fact that Gameport joystick on PC takes 1 ms to read using port 201h (directly read port). I know Amiga joystick read takes, a few microseconds. Thus, you cannot emulate an Amiga joystick on PC using PC joystick. It'll never EQUAL OR EXCEL it.
>>Same claims I made using timers with 1.19Mhz timer vs. 7.16Mhz cycle accuracy and other claims.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Sorry for the long quote.
>Amigaski, you're twisting the truth. You invent your own definitions - none of which are in line with that of the rest of the world. You deliberately use definitions intended for completely different contexts. You simply do whatever to support your claims rather than accepting the fact that you're wrong. This is especially retarded considering that we're discussing an area of which you yourself admit that you have no real knowledge. You're simply amazing on your own very special way.
I did not invent the definition. I didn't twist the truth-- I'm sticking to my definition. It's retarded to say that Atari 800 can emulate P4-Quad core given time and memory. I never said I have no knowledge of emulators-- I have written some emulators as well for joysticks, mice, keyboards, etc.